Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 25D3238000065; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SaZCu-0003me-20 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:16:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SaZCt-0003mV-KG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:16:27 +0100 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SaZCr-0003Hj-0G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:16:26 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews19.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.185]) by cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:16:24 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.5]) by cpsps-ews19.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:16:23 +0200 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:16:23 +0200 Message-ID: <435D293248114658AC53DFB8A3C50493@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <02bb01cd3eb1$c4cb1730$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <1338444302.19906.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <18D068A53AF74F56BF8AFDCCAB65CC62@AGB> <1338488029.92944.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <97F0E98E40814C45B796CFAF1351D46C@AGB> <4FC7CDF7.1090909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC7E2FC.3070002@psk31.plus.com> <3DD43F40887A4C08A4F53031CB126B04@AGB> <4FC7E880.8020604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC7F143.7080106@psk31.plus.com> <9327865B4D2146DC9D9667D4740BAA56@AGB> <916F21C1B61C4940BDF1E88FBD13845C@Extensa> <4FC921C8.9010705@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC921C8.9010705@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:16:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2012 21:16:23.0617 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC2A1310:01CD403B] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, I use version 2.77 b13 here. I ask it, just to be sure all 4 Spectrum labs are not pulling the SR individual into a other direction... Sometimes happpens something similar at my job when a cable reel starts rolling and a colleague wants to slow it down and the other just wants him rol quicker. They go grumbling to each other.... :-) [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Subject: Re: LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question. Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:459726656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cb4fc931780a2d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Stefan, I use version 2.77 b13 here. I ask it, just to be sure all 4 Spectrum labs are not pulling the SR individual into a other direction... Sometimes happpens something similar at my job when a cable reel starts rolling and a colleague wants to slow it down and the other just wants him rol quicker. They go grumbling to each other.... :-) O.T.: Not 100% the same, but I think these 2 cable install engineers did start grumbling to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNdxVAdz0KY :-) 73's, Peter - PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 8:10 PM Subject: Re: LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question. > Hi Peter, > > I'm not sure if there are new versions that do the job in one instance. But normally you need the sample rate detector in each SL > instance separately. > > What version are you using? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 01.06.2012 20:50, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: >> Hello... >> >> I was wondering the following: >> >> I have here 4x Spectrum Lab task running at one PC to serve my SUB9KHz grabber page at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb >> I use that Sampling Rate detector in all 4 Spectrum Lab tasks. >> Is that OK, or need I only one Sampling Rate detector that callibrates the other 3 tasks to ? >> (one master - 3 clients without that SR cal active) >> >> 73's Peter - PA1SDB >> >> >