Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5E20D3800008F; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 08:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ScbeF-0001Wk-R8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:17:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ScbeF-0001Wb-BV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:17:07 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.laposte.net ([193.253.67.230] helo=smtpout.laposte.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ScbeD-0001We-C3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:17:06 +0100 Received: from wwinf8307 ([10.99.54.222]) by mwinf8509-out with ME id KQH41j0044nfl4A03QH4ck; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:17:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:17:04 +0200 From: "manginbenoit.pro" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <1608727203.579919.1339071424127.JavaMail.www@wwinf8307> In-Reply-To: <4FD0999E.3080206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <00ad01cd424c$0138a690$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d301cd4255$b6428ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <636F5742-6949-4616-9CFD-3FCF99B4506A@gmail.com> <00f301cd4263$4ce62880$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCCD78A.6030302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FD08634.8010402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000b01cd449e$8ed026a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <989268713.594928.1339069782716.JavaMail.www@wwinf8316> <4FD0999E.3080206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [82.246.206.85] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lucky you Stefan, lucky you ! Probably the reason for your KW ERP. My "reasonable" setup indicates me that triple that value could be necessary... CU there [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [193.253.67.230 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (manginbenoit.pro[at]laposte.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_579918_687132046.1339071424124" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:392159616:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405a4fd09bf40ddd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_Part_579918_687132046.1339071424124 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lucky you Stefan, lucky you ! Probably the reason for your KW ERP. My "reasonable" setup indicates me that triple that value could be necessar= y... CU there Ben > Message du 07/06/12 14:12 > De : "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer"=20 > A : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Copie =C3=A0 :=20 > Objet : Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz > > I only heared some rumours about the permission starting January, 1st,=20 > 2013, here in DL. Also i heard rumours that a permit is given out on the= =20 > Ham Radio 2012 (http://www.hamradio-friedrichshafen.de/ham-en/index.php)= =20 > , which would be in 3 weeks! But i guess 2013 is more realistic. >=20 > Time to build a suitable loading coil for MF. I will need about 240 uH=20 > only... >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 > Am 07.06.2012 13:49, schrieb manginbenoit.pro: > > Are there other EU countries (apart from the British Isles)=20 > > granting MF access to the amateur service so fast ? > > > > We in France still did not hear even the smallest whisper from our=20 > > tutelage administration. Or maybe am I not well informed. > > > > 73 > > > > Ben >=20 >=20 Une messagerie gratuite, garantie =C3=A0 vie et des services en plus, =C3= =A7a vous tente ? Je cr=C3=A9e ma bo=C3=AEte mail www.laposte.net ------=_Part_579918_687132046.1339071424124 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lucky you Stefan, lucky you ! Probably the reason for your KW ERP.
My "reasonable" setup indicates me that  triple = that value could be necessary...

CU there

Ben

> Message du 07/06/12 14:12
> De : &quo= t;Stefan Schäfer"
> A : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz
&g= t;
> I only heared some rumours about the permission starting Janua= ry, 1st,
> 2013, here in DL. Also i heard rumours that a permit is= given out on the
> Ham Radio 2012 (http://www.hamradio-friedrichs= hafen.de/ham-en/index.php)
> , which would be in 3 weeks! But i gu= ess 2013 is more realistic.
>
> Time to build a suitable l= oading coil for MF. I will need about 240 uH
> only...
> <= br />> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> Am 07.06.2012 13:49, schrie= b manginbenoit.pro:
> > Are there other EU countries (apart from= the British Isles)
> > granting MF access to the amateur servi= ce so fast ?
> >
> > We in France still did not hear = even the smallest whisper from our
> > tutelage administration.= Or maybe am I not well informed.
> >
> > 73
>= ; >
> > Ben
>
>
------=_Part_579918_687132046.1339071424124--