Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A919C3800008C; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:08:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SgLkG-0007QX-9L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:06:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SgLkF-0007QO-1q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:06:47 +0100 Received: from nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.192]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SgLkC-0008H8-Q7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:06:45 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.51] by nm16.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jun 2012 20:06:43 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.227] by tm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jun 2012 20:06:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jun 2012 20:06:43 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 751249.74345.bm@omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 16449 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2012 20:06:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=eUZPaVoRsGJkx5kXsGAXctZdaTqbgm6m6YMKJLiA5U4VhW6hZB14EA3E0/UZYQnfPRaaz6vGcSV9Q2G3VcmiuwALE1woOv6ROIxt0mWEpm12xaRj2RyyDh4bcBIYs+jYUdIA+D6NjdP86Zzakqk42nAgD4v8WkMB1CYlf+vvEyQ= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1339963603; bh=5MFRLLj3SJ2t3HGEwVDwQTquQDByeVYOxkvE7FhSERo=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=zUpQe1w5TVM8QxPRzzryh2Egi0xb6zR3Gu3LZMML55XS29QFm2ngsZwOjc60bb4TaxyfyIrmP/z90chD6B5ZiCPggpVOUa4OF+BIwCFLjFtQjpoQKT7vcSVLpEPaJ5qaok4IgIWmcuP/+yef3ZGT+qOzg0TE6iFhOF6G3mALY3w= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: I1pxCtIVM1kwd3e9r.AMBsj0ra4.gBftccMoFlnRdOedhEg olZYWdO2Jj0XhOB6VMzNMhSaKDA_rEL4K9sFD903kA6moWVtCsDwvdMTu24h iUVSGjubzezXUjR_zyi5sLr4UwunTccXp1yqGhdsWoE8Y_tVKWQWkAzl3xqT YJ2bU1_c1ZoNWMSQFpINSH1yCwO4dbMf2MqhfKnkwVEJnBT5P8.jnOcBisWF RyHILExiQBDoAxHSm9nxZYypNNf4uq93mNvJTXSWPUIlkOOMwTLvVbsDrpXu 4Xy9uiB6SRIExVoQtUNHpso9bry4iZuR_zz7smQSyqvXjPydz8ROjj8hRt19 23tKKCBEFQTaqEyxlQesGq4p4tlyQG_Zao1rIgKWsaDGQ3L5MynbKKNKh_LT CqHrXLGKE X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.185.202.35 with login) by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2012 20:06:43 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <15B9C0CD09D4429B83AB1E02595502AD@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <4FDDE3C9.8080505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FDDE3C9.8080505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:06:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Stefan, LF Group, > I just thought my receiver isn't working correctly. I thought the xtal > does not start to oscillate due to the higher ambient temperatures in the > afternoon. But later i found that the band noise on MF is significantly > lower than in the evening, at least 20 dB. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.192 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: LF: Re: Further MF impressions Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:444593536:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m024.1 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cc4fde393f2a6b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Stefan, LF Group, > I just thought my receiver isn't working correctly. I thought the xtal > does not start to oscillate due to the higher ambient temperatures in the > afternoon. But later i found that the band noise on MF is significantly > lower than in the evening, at least 20 dB. As well as the natural band noise being lower at MF (I estimate the noise FS is about 10dB lower), there is also not the constant presence of man-made noise, such as Loran and DCF39 sidebands. So the spectrum around 500kHz does sound much quieter, especially during daytime. > > What do others know about the ground wave range in summer and in the > afternoon? When does the band open? Similar to LF? As others have said, broadly similar to LF - sky wave is very weak until darkness has arrived, so ground wave dominates daytime communication. Ground wave signal levels seem to depend greatly on the type of ground at distances more than 100km or so. For example I can easily hear G3KEV during the daytime here, and the path from Hatfield to Scarborough is over flat, high-conductivity ground down the east of England. But G4WGT and G0NBD, and stations in Wales, are extremely weak in daylight at similar distances, although they are quite strong after dark The ground path to these stations is over hilly, lower conductivity ground. Sky wave signals over fairly long distances show very deep fading over periods of a few minutes - signal levels are usually constantly changing, and I have often seen variation of over 30dB in one minute on beacon signals. This can make QSOs difficult, with a signal that was R5 suddenly disappearing completely and not even visible on the spectrogram. Over very long distances, trans-atlantic for example, the fading seems less severe although signals are usually quite weak and propagation is very variable. For contacts around Europe, I would say 136k actually gives more reliable signal levels, but for many stations 500k is easier because higher ERP can be achieved with a small antenna, and noise levels are often lower. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU