From: pat <g4gvw@aol.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <006601cd473d$d4da5cf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <004201cd4730$cc020860$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
	 <57131D54FA1241D8BBE53212C31F7BF0@Shack>
	 <006601cd473d$d4da5cf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:35:53 +0100
Message-ID: <1339428953.3961.1.camel@g4gvw-high-grade>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Seems about par for the course typical turnout for an election
    innit? On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 19:18 +0000, mal hamilton wrote: > Ok Tony >
    But two thirds of the members did not vote, > g3kev > > ----- Original Message
    ----- > From: Tony > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Sunday, June
    10, 2012 6:15 PM > Subject: LF: Re: Votes > > > 70% Yahoo > 10% Black Sheep
    > 19% Continue with both > > No idea who the other 1% is ;-) > > Tony, EI8JK
    > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: mal hamilton > To: rsgb > Sent:
   Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:45 PM > Subject: LF: Votes > > > Well > Only 57 votes
    and 167 members of the Yahoo group. Out > of 57 how many voted for Yahoo.
    This does not look > convincing that Yahoo was the way to go. > g3kev > [...]
 Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [64.12.206.39 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (g4gvw[at]aol.com)
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Votes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:484279072:93952408  
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m023.2 ; domain : mx.aol.com DKIM : pass  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f4fd60fb06b95
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Seems about par for the course typical turnout for an election innit?




On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 19:18 +0000, mal hamilton wrote:
> Ok Tony
> But two thirds of the members did not vote,
> g3kev
>  
>         ----- Original Message ----- 
>         From: Tony 
>         To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>         Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 6:15 PM
>         Subject: LF: Re: Votes
>         
>         
>         70% Yahoo
>         10% Black Sheep
>         19% Continue with both
>          
>         No idea who the other 1% is ;-)
>          
>         Tony, EI8JK
>          
>                 ----- Original Message ----- 
>                 From: mal hamilton 
>                 To: rsgb 
>                 Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:45 PM
>                 Subject: LF: Votes
>                 
>                 
>                 Well
>                 Only 57 votes and 167 members of the Yahoo group. Out
>                 of 57 how many voted for Yahoo. This does not look
>                 convincing that Yahoo was the way to go.
>                 g3kev
>                  

-- 
73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK