Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5164E380000B8; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:28:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbHOb-0005Zy-Qr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:27:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbHOb-0005Zp-Bu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:27:29 +0100 Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbHOZ-0003Yj-F8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:27:28 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.130]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q53KRMfF015042 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:27:22 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (host-92-6-242-34.as43234.net [92.6.242.34]) by mtaout-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 1025DE0000BA for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:27:21 -0400 (EDT) From: pat To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <8208EBBB3DEF446C8B540F5BEBB38570@AGB> References: <8208EBBB3DEF446C8B540F5BEBB38570@AGB> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:31:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1338755490.3947.8.camel@g4gvw-high-grade> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1338755242; bh=RwCNK+kqx2ORjSMo0U99LlEW58Xsm19oDuJ5S5F9Ufo=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=xnd6c457JCut3O7FwcT7Y+qT7Wa5fjaV56+MLlwtmIrqqPOP/Zc4EU6xKSgmeR9ev atEeeO0zZcgzdyH6d8Ay1acGaGxuvktrnkWLFCkpACXDuxckUzL6K+Q2Pw5nx8h0yY v+ELdY/W4e6LZ+SHvbWaojkfKv1xmoKWaC4NMDk8= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:422864576:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There are those in the Amateur Radio community who have no other profession than Amateur Radio just as there are those whose professional practice amounts to no more than a hobby! On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 19:09 +0100, Graham wrote: > ''professional amateurs''. > > Ah .... tricky that one ! > > G.. > > > From: Tony > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:00 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Fence sitter > > > I will put my hand up and admit that I'm one of those members that > doesn't post very often. > To make matters worse, I don't transmit and only receive LF on a very > irregular basis. > > The reason I joined the black sheep reflector was to get technical > information to enable me to eventually build an LF system, and that is > the reason I'm still here. > On many days the reflector is full of reception reports which are of > no interest to me at all, also requests for skeds which again are of > no interest to me, I've even seen reports of activity on 10m & 6m > which I can easily see for myself on any cluster. > All these unwanted (for me) posts are easily marked as "read" in my > email program, but I'm not sure I would find it so easy if all post > were duplicated over two different reflectors. > > So I shall continue to sit on the fence and see which reflector > attracts the technical posters, including "underground" earth mode > results, and use that one and cancel the other. > > I have to say that the last few days have reminded me of a girls > school, all bitching, tantrums and tears. Not really what you would > expect from grown up professional amateurs. > > Tony, EI8JK. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.105.146 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (g4gvw[at]aol.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49 Subject: Re: LF: Fence sitter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:444990080:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m219.1 ; domain : mx.aol.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d74fcbc8de7dce X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none There are those in the Amateur Radio community who have no other profession than Amateur Radio just as there are those whose professional practice amounts to no more than a hobby! On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 19:09 +0100, Graham wrote: > ''professional amateurs''. > > Ah .... tricky that one ! > > G.. > > > From: Tony > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:00 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Fence sitter > > > I will put my hand up and admit that I'm one of those members that > doesn't post very often. > To make matters worse, I don't transmit and only receive LF on a very > irregular basis. > > The reason I joined the black sheep reflector was to get technical > information to enable me to eventually build an LF system, and that is > the reason I'm still here. > On many days the reflector is full of reception reports which are of > no interest to me at all, also requests for skeds which again are of > no interest to me, I've even seen reports of activity on 10m & 6m > which I can easily see for myself on any cluster. > All these unwanted (for me) posts are easily marked as "read" in my > email program, but I'm not sure I would find it so easy if all post > were duplicated over two different reflectors. > > So I shall continue to sit on the fence and see which reflector > attracts the technical posters, including "underground" earth mode > results, and use that one and cancel the other. > > I have to say that the last few days have reminded me of a girls > school, all bitching, tantrums and tears. Not really what you would > expect from grown up professional amateurs. > > Tony, EI8JK. -- 73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK