Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 809A538000081; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 10:05:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbBPm-00085I-1x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:04:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbBPl-000859-Ig for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:04:17 +0100 Received: from smtpout03.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.115] helo=email.aon.at) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbBPj-0001as-Ra for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:04:16 +0100 Received: (qmail 19089 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2012 14:04:14 -0000 Received: from 93-82-6-24.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO [192.168.1.100]) (aon.912371987@[93.82.6.24]) (envelope-sender ) by smarthub82.res.a1.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Jun 2012 14:04:14 -0000 Message-ID: <1338732253.5864.12.camel@gerhard-desktop-acer> From: Gerhard Hickl To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 16:04:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 195.3.96.115 (smtpout03.highway.telekom.at) used invalid HELO/EHLO email.aon.at - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Geri! I'm using this reflector now for a couple of years and I don't receive spam-mails at all. So the reflector is for sure NOT the reason for the spams you receive. I also never experienced serious problems in getting mails through. I do appreciate the limitation in attachment size. This is preventing people of posting schematics with a resolution of 600dpi and more. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.3.96.115 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gerhard.hickl[at]aon.at) X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:359052672:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94fcb6f0b3a5f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Geri! I'm using this reflector now for a couple of years and I don't receive spam-mails at all. So the reflector is for sure NOT the reason for the spams you receive. I also never experienced serious problems in getting mails through. I do appreciate the limitation in attachment size. This is preventing people of posting schematics with a resolution of 600dpi and more. So in my opinion it would be sad if this reflector would be shut down. BTW: I don't like big companies, nor do I trustOn the air, we are used to exchange minimal information, often not more than some dots and dashes but when it comes to internet, some them. "Mic..soft", "Yah..", "Go..le", "A..le".....to be continued. OE3GHB Gerhard Am Sonntag, den 03.06.2012, 11:11 +0200 schrieb DK8KW & DI2BO: > Hi, > > While I can understand some people's wishes to continue on the blacksheep server, those should understand that the move to Yahoo is not because email servers are suddenly outdated and not 'en vogue' any longer. There are reasons behind this transition. Some (many?) of us had trouble to post in the past couple of months and were on 'read only' mode due to some issues with the server. I had tried multiple times to post here and, due to the lack of time, I had to give up. Only recently I found a workaround by using a completely different email account. I am glad that with the Yahoo Group I can return to read and hopefully post on a regular basis, making use of the LF/MF's community joint intelligence and experience. > > Talking about advertisements and spam: the email address that I used only for the LF-reflector has been swamped in the past years by mails from people from foreign countries offering a lot of money if I assist them to transfer money of numerous people who suddenly and sadly passed away. I am glad to get rid of those spams as well now and gladly take into account some advertisements on the Yahoo group. > > 73 > > Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO > > On 03.06.2012, at 10:37, pws wrote: > > > To John, G3WKL, > > > > Please do NOT shut down this reflector. > > > > 1. It's active in positive sense. > > > > 2. There are too many hams here who say > > "no thanks!" to that advertisement driven > > Brave New World were each posting will be > > "googleable" for ever. Me too. > > > > That's the reason I unsubscribed from > > some Yapoo-Groups recently. > > > > 73 Peter, df3lp > > >