Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 45F5838001A7E; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:58:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ShNHP-00037v-R1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:57:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ShNHP-00037m-9b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:57:15 +0100 Received: from mailout10.t-online.de ([194.25.134.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ShNHN-0004Kx-6g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:57:14 +0100 Received: from fwd24.aul.t-online.de (fwd24.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout10.t-online.de with smtp id 1ShNHK-0004mH-Kn; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:57:10 +0200 Received: from standard9dmup1 (SOFBYYZJQhVFpBBVVIq-wdMp+RHqm-14Md8WH9KRSDsLoWTB5UrDGXf-CtVDbobZyZ@[84.147.165.190]) by fwd24.t-online.de with esmtp id 1ShNHG-1lopzk0; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:57:06 +0200 Message-ID: <0C6B2C0519D74D279732BB4DC9974B3A@standard9dmup1> From: "Walter Staubach" To: References: <4FE06941.6020404@kabelmail.de> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:57:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-ID: SOFBYYZJQhVFpBBVVIq-wdMp+RHqm-14Md8WH9KRSDsLoWTB5UrDGXf-CtVDbobZyZ X-TOI-MSGID: a863d171-1834-4660-98d2-1b9ab497f301 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Horst, as you already did in earlier times you do now: Standing besides the road and tell to hard working people what they should have done better. Note: If the MF-regulation does not meet your needs - you are not forced to use this nice band. Others will do with pleasure. 73 Walter [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: c1dcf088149efa0360827745859da381 Subject: Re: LF: Text of MF-Allocation to German Hams Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD4F0E.1AE7D5B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:435647744:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554fe1f32c2717 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD4F0E.1AE7D5B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Horst, as you already did in earlier times you do now: Standing besides the = road and tell to hard working people what they should have done better. Note: If the MF-regulation does not meet your needs - you are not forced = to use this nice band. Others will do with pleasure. 73 Walter =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Horst St=C3=B6cker"=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:54 AM Subject: Aw: LF: Text of MF-Allocation to German Hams Just 1W ERP - this will be also the maximum power after the full = implementation of WRC2012 in 2013. I got this information also by the = BNetzA. What was the maximum power in WRC2012? The DARC, especially DK4VW, made a big deal. Really? The new allocation will only ge for the class A, not for the class E. = Whats so funny about? With DI2AN I was allowed to transmit with max. 9W = ERP. Anyone - not just HAMs - still can get these licences in germany. = As HAM with class E even not 1W ERP - just nothing. It's a similar situation as with the HAM band >250GHz. But with one = Difference: When >250GHz became a HAM band in DL the RegTP (now BNetzA) = remembered that there were experimental stations (like my DA5FS) with = every kind of licences. So one decided for the only logical consequence: = >250THz ist still allocated to class A AND E HAMs. Really a big deal about 492kHz! I know ones more why I left the club! Horst DO1KHS (ex DA5FS, ex DI2AN) Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 um 13:57 Uhr Von: DK1IS An: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: LF: Text of MF-Allocation to German Hams=20 Dear group, to whom it may concern: enclosed please find the official text of the=20 MF-allocation in Germany which I=C2=B4ve got today via email from our=20 authorising agency "Bundesnetzagentur" (BNetzA). 73 and cul on MF! Tom, DK1IS JN59WK =20 Ihr WEB.DE Postfach immer dabei: die kostenlose WEB.DE Mail App = f=C3=BCr iPhone und Android. =20 https://produkte.web.de/freemail_mobile_startseite/=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD4F0E.1AE7D5B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Horst,
    as you already did = in earlier=20 times you do now: Standing besides the road and tell to hard working = people what=20 they should have done better.
Note: If the MF-regulation does not = meet your needs=20 - you are not forced to use this nice band. Others will do with=20 pleasure.
73
Walter
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 "Horst=20 St=C3=B6cker"
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 = 9:54=20 AM
Subject: Aw: LF: Text of = MF-Allocation to=20 German Hams

Just 1W ERP - this will be also the maximum power after the full=20 implementation of WRC2012 in 2013. I got this information also by the = BNetzA.=20 What was the maximum power in WRC2012?
The DARC, especially DK4VW, made a big deal. Really?
The new allocation will only ge for the class A, not for the = class E.=20 Whats so funny about? With DI2AN I was allowed to transmit with max. = 9W ERP.=20 Anyone - not just HAMs - still can get these licences in germany. As = HAM with=20 class E even not 1W ERP - just nothing.
It's a similar situation as with the HAM band >250GHz. But = with one=20 Difference: When >250GHz became a HAM band in DL the RegTP (now = BNetzA)=20 remembered that there were experimental stations (like my DA5FS) with = every=20 kind of licences. So one decided for the only logical consequence: = >250THz=20 ist still allocated to class A AND E HAMs.
Really a big deal about 492kHz! I know ones more why I left the=20 club!
Horst DO1KHS (ex DA5FS, ex DI2AN)

Gesendet: Dienstag, = 19. Juni=20 2012 um 13:57 Uhr
Von: DK1IS=20 = <DK1IS@kabelmail.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.c= o.uk,=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: LF: Text of = MF-Allocation=20 to German Hams
Dear group,

to whom it may = concern: enclosed=20 please find the official text of the
MF-allocation in Germany = which I=C2=B4ve=20 got today via email from our
authorising agency = "Bundesnetzagentur"=20 (BNetzA).

73 and cul on MF!

Tom, = DK1IS
JN59WK


  

Ihr=20 WEB.DE Postfach immer dabei: die kostenlose WEB.DE Mail App = f=C3=BCr iPhone=20 und Android.   
https://p= rodukte.web.de/freemail_mobile_startseite/ ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01CD4F0E.1AE7D5B0--