Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 874D33800008C; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 10:58:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbCFS-0000mg-FU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:57:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbCFS-0000mX-2K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:57:42 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbCFQ-0001xM-Bg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:57:40 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIJALJ6y09cF/B0/2dsb2JhbABEsngEgSWBCIITBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh2wDD6t9CIlTixEaNAOCKYMWA4gNhTCQfoZWgmCBVgUE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,708,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="374195425" Received: from host-92-23-240-116.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.240.116]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 03 Jun 2012 15:57:38 +0100 Message-ID: <00db01cd4199$36b3fee0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00a201cd4197$444c2340$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:57:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well expressed Jay. There are more indicating to remain with the status quo Blacksheep reflector than moving. but where are the other 150 members that are supposed to be subscribed - all sitting on the Fence or out Grazing I would suggest a U - TURN mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: LF: Re: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:432692608:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4fcb7b946f24 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Well expressed Jay. There are more indicating to remain with the status quo Blacksheep reflector than moving. but where are the other 150 members that are supposed to be subscribed - all sitting on the Fence or out Grazing I would suggest a U - TURN mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep" Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 2:43 PM Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep > <2 cents> > > It seems only a couple folks are requesting an immediate shutdown of blacksheep. Why not let both > run simultaneously for some time and see which wins out? It should be a simple matter to judge, > after a period of time, which is more popular. > > Some folks (me included) are not interested in having their messages archived for eternity ... or > looking for a place to upload articles or pictures of a new gadget. There are other simple options > for doing this outside of yahoo. I don't want to notified each time someone uploads a new snapshot. > > I'm set up to receive both yahoo and blacksheep via e mail so don't see the 'fuss' to receive both. > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > >