Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C324838000096; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbXJG-0003U2-I6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:27:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbXJF-0003Tt-Nn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:27:01 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbXJD-0006kM-0I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:27:00 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4FAJi2zE9cF/ub/2dsb2JhbABEhU6ZBYUDh2ABiHCBCIITBQEBBQgBAQMWMwIsAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBCYdjAw8HpA+IPg2JTooxYBuEY4ESA409iG2JbIR7gmA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,712,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="383150484" Received: from host-92-23-251-155.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.251.155]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 14:26:57 +0100 Message-ID: <00d301cd4255$b6428ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00ad01cd424c$0138a690$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:26:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I am only quoting what you published reference items 9 and 10. In some other messages from you there is also mention of vetting and banning. Why is this such a problem with you. No one else seems to be concerned. I am merely pointing out concerns that I have about some of your postings where vetting and banning keeps cropping up. My argument and others is that one should be allowed to get their opinion heard without fear or favour and I do no like to bombarded with words that imply restrictive practice. I am not aware of any attack going on but surely I am permitted to challenge what others say, if it effects me and in this case the move to the Yahoo reflector does, as it does others as well and they are expressing their opinions daily. It particularly effects me since I am one of the few radio amateurs that are active daily on 500 and 137 khz and a voice on the reflector is useful to update activity, propagation conditions, DX alerts and technical data about changes of equipment, power etc. Modes currently available when in CQ mode ie CW or Opera. [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 84ab60ecdd4473835b39687102047368 Subject: Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CD4255.B5E59DB0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:518226688:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d74fccb7ef26d3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CD4255.B5E59DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am only quoting what you published reference items 9 and 10. In some = other messages from you there is also mention of vetting and banning. = Why is this such a problem with you. No one else seems to be concerned.=20 I am merely pointing out concerns that I have about some of your = postings where vetting and banning keeps cropping up. My argument and others is that one should be allowed to get their = opinion heard without fear or favour and I do no like to bombarded with = words that imply restrictive practice. I am not aware of any attack going on but surely I am permitted to = challenge what others say, if it effects me and in this case the move to = the Yahoo reflector does, as it does others as well and they are = expressing their opinions daily.=20 It particularly effects me since I am one of the few radio amateurs that = are active daily on 500 and 137 khz and a voice on the reflector is = useful to update activity, propagation conditions, DX alerts and = technical data about changes of equipment, power etc. Modes currently available when in CQ mode ie CW or Opera.=20 de g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 12:33 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Dear Mal, Who said anything about ME being a moderator of the LF group? Not me.=20 Please, stop this personal and nasty hate campaign.=20 73s Roger G3XBM -- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver -- On 4 Jun 2012, at 13:17, "mal hamilton" wrote: Reference postings from G3XBM I am concerned about items 9 and 10 Messages can be VETTED and DIFFICULT members banned. Sounds like a POLICE state and what are the credentials of those = VETTING and what is a DIFFICULT member probably someone who has a = different opinion or point of view from his or even a sense of HUMOUR What ever happens avoid him as a moderator de g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; Alan Melia ; Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer ; Markus Vester ; James Moritz=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 PM Subject: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE With the latest outage (5 days already) may I again suggest that = the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group? In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or = problems with any group to which I belong or moderate. Instead they have had these advantages: 1.. Messages can be read on the web if preferred (saves = cluttered in-boxes) 2.. There is rarely a delay of more than a few minutes before = messages are received.=20 3.. All messages are archived and searchable. 4.. Large files can be stored.=20 5.. Photos can be stored - 100Gigs worth.=20 6.. Links can be stored/shared=20 7.. Videos can be stored.=20 8.. Polls can be run.=20 9.. Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a number of = moderators to speed up the process)=20 10.. Difficult members can be banned in exceptional = circumstances.=20 11.. Spam messages can be filtered 12.. Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc) = The advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply cannot = understand why the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems this = week it is surely time. To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or whatever) = would take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all interested = members here would take about a day at most. All you need is to agree a = group name, who owns it, who can moderate posts and some basic group = ground rules/FAQs. Please, think about it again.=20 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ ------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CD4255.B5E59DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
I am only quoting what you published reference = items 9 and=20 10. In some other messages from you there is also mention of vetting and = banning. Why is this such a problem with you. No one else seems to be = concerned.=20
 I am merely pointing out concerns that I = have about=20 some of your postings where vetting and banning keeps cropping=20 up.
My argument and others is that one should = be allowed=20 to get their opinion heard without fear or favour and I do no like to = bombarded=20 with words that imply restrictive practice.
I am not aware of any attack going on but = surely I am=20 permitted to challenge what others say, if it effects me and in = this case=20 the move to the Yahoo reflector does, as it does others as well and they = are=20 expressing their opinions daily.
It particularly effects me since I am one of the = few radio=20 amateurs that are active daily on 500 and 137 khz and a voice=20 on the reflector is useful to update activity, propagation=20 conditions, DX alerts and technical data about changes of = equipment, power etc.
Modes currently available when in CQ mode ie CW=20 or Opera.
 
de g3kev
   
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Roger=20 Lapthorn
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 = 12:33=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: An = "LF-reflector"=20 Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

Dear Mal,

Who said anything about ME being a moderator of the LF group? Not = me. 

Please, stop this personal and nasty hate campaign. 

73s
Roger
G3XBM



-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --

On 4 Jun 2012, at 13:17, "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:

Reference postings from G3XBM
I am concerned about items 9  and = 10
Messages can be VETTED and DIFFICULT members = banned.
Sounds like a POLICE state and what are the=20 credentials of those VETTING and what is a DIFFICULT member probably = someone=20 who has a different opinion or point of view from his or even a = sense of=20 HUMOUR
What ever happens avoid him as a=20 moderator
 
de g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Roger Lapthorn
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20 ; Alan Melia ; Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer ; Markus=20 Vester ; James Moritz =
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, = 2012 9:51=20 PM
Subject: LF: An = "LF-reflector" Yahoo=20 group instead .....PLEASE

With the latest outage (5 days already) may I again = suggest=20 that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group?

In over 10 = years I=20 have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or problems with any = group to=20 which I belong or moderate.

Instead they have had these=20 advantages:
  1. Messages can be read on the web if preferred (saves = cluttered=20 in-boxes)
  2. There is rarely a delay of more than a few minutes before = messages=20 are received.=20
  3. All messages are archived and searchable.
  4. Large files can be stored.=20
  5. Photos can be stored - 100Gigs worth.=20
  6. Links can be stored/shared=20
  7. Videos can be stored.=20
  8. Polls can be run.=20
  9. Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a number of = moderators to=20 speed up the process)=20
  10. Difficult members can be banned in exceptional = circumstances.=20
  11. Spam messages can be filtered
  12. Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc)=20
The advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply = cannot=20 understand why the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems = this=20 week it is surely time.

To set up a new Yahoo group called=20 "LF-reflector" (or whatever) would take about 30 seconds and = migration to=20 it by all interested members here would take about a day at most. = All you=20 need is to agree a group name, who owns it, who can moderate posts = and=20 some basic group ground rules/FAQs.

Please, think about it = again.=20

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

=
------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CD4255.B5E59DB0--