Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B5CE6380000AB; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 10:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbBut-0000Nz-4z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:36:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbBus-0000Nq-Jl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:36:26 +0100 Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbBuq-0001pE-FU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:36:25 +0100 Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Hp9y1j0051ZXKqc5DqcNS9; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:36:22 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HqcM1j01F0CFS1j3hqcNEN; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:36:22 +0000 Message-ID: <006a01cd4196$3f0d52b0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep" , References: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 10:36:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: <2 cents> It seems only a couple folks are requesting an immediate shutdown of blacksheep. Why not let both run simultaneously for some time and see which wins out? It should be a simple matter to judge, after a period of time, which is more popular. [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 5fc8987c5011a8849fb47b0998281191 Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0066_01CD4174.B7C00940" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:208123712:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41184fcb76a2347f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0066_01CD4174.B7C00940 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <2 cents> It seems only a couple folks are requesting an immediate shutdown of blacksheep. Why not let both run simultaneously for some time and see which wins out? It should be a simple matter to judge, after a period of time, which is more popular. Some folks (me included) are not interested in having their messages archived for eternity ... or looking for a place to upload articles or pictures of a new gadget. There are other simple options for doing this outside of yahoo. I don't want to notified each time someone uploads a new snapshot. I'm set up to receive both yahoo and blacksheep via e mail so don't see the 'fuss' to receive both. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 __,_._,___ ------=_NextPart_000_0066_01CD4174.B7C00940 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 <2 cents>
 
It seems only a couple folks are = requesting an=20 immediate shutdown of blacksheep. Why not let both run = simultaneously for=20 some time and see which wins out? It should be a simple matter to judge, = after a=20 period of time, which is more = popular.  
 
Some folks (me = included) are not=20 interested in having their messages archived for = eternity ... or=20 looking for a place to upload articles or pictures of a new gadget. = There=20 are other simple options for doing this outside of yahoo. I don't = want=20 to notified each time someone uploads a new=20 snapshot.
 
I'm set up to receive both yahoo and = blacksheep via=20 e mail so don't see the 'fuss' to receive both.
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  = WE2XGR/2
 
</2=20 cents>          
__,_._,___
------=_NextPart_000_0066_01CD4174.B7C00940--