Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 35F1238000082; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:20:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sdnf6-0004fC-PT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:18:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sdnf2-0004f3-GJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:18:52 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdnf0-0001EX-Q9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:18:51 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFAL/y1E9cF/HU/2dsb2JhbABFnn4DhH+QWYEIghMFAQEFCAEBA0kCLAEBAwUCAQMEDQQBAQolFAEEGgYMCggGEwoBAgIBAYdsAw+3MYpGYYJOgxsDiA2FMZJehH2CYA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,385,1336345200"; d="scan'208,217";a="383929528" Received: from host-92-23-241-212.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.241.212]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 10 Jun 2012 20:18:38 +0100 Message-ID: <006601cd473d$d4da5cf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <004201cd4730$cc020860$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <57131D54FA1241D8BBE53212C31F7BF0@Shack> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:18:34 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok Tony But two thirds of the members did not vote, g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 6:15 PM Subject: LF: Re: Votes 70% Yahoo 10% Black Sheep 19% Continue with both [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 24b65a258fa7a3a87cfdaa03bb2f3176 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Votes Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01CD473D.D4A39580" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:481843200:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60594fd4f3744cf5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01CD473D.D4A39580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Tony But two thirds of the members did not vote, g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tony=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 6:15 PM Subject: LF: Re: Votes 70% Yahoo 10% Black Sheep 19% Continue with both No idea who the other 1% is ;-) Tony, EI8JK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb=20 Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:45 PM Subject: LF: Votes Well Only 57 votes and 167 members of the Yahoo group. Out of 57 how many = voted for Yahoo. This does not look convincing that Yahoo was the way to = go. g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01CD473D.D4A39580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Tony
But two thirds of the members did not = vote,
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tony=20
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 = 6:15 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Votes

70% Yahoo
10% Black Sheep
19% Continue with both
 
No idea who the other 1% is = ;-)
 
Tony, EI8JK
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 mal=20 hamilton
To: rsgb
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 = 5:45=20 PM
Subject: LF: Votes

Well
Only 57 votes and 167 members of the Yahoo = group. Out=20 of 57 how many voted for Yahoo. This does not look convincing that = Yahoo was=20 the way to go.
g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_0063_01CD473D.D4A39580--