Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D5B03380000A0; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbEZf-0003Sf-Vb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:26:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbEZf-0003SW-Ed for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:26:43 +0100 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbEZd-0002qZ-Qo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:26:42 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAOGcy09Ok8gE/2dsb2JhbABEnlKVT4EIghMFAQEFCAEBA0kCLAEBAwUCAQMEDQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh361SYsRgnqDFgONPZdUgmA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,708,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="388198042" Received: from host-78-147-200-4.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.200.4]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 03 Jun 2012 18:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <004b01cd41ae$095039e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de><000b01cd416c$9bef0a20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d501cd4198$727929b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCB93EC.3030907@psk31.plus.com> <270B05A58E9F46F4AD21EFF298F32DE6@Shack> <4FCB9A03.8080802@usa.net> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:26:39 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Blacksheep was administered by Fair minded persons and organised in a democratic manner with freedom of expression. From what G3XBM implied Yahoo membership would not be the case, one reason why he wanted the move. That is what he said, not my words. Cannot say I have heard you active on the LF/MF bands, silent operator. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.239 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 47a967f57bae6380aac0a0062beb1b4e Subject: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0048_01CD41AE.09149070" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:497196384:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d74fcb9e8916c8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01CD41AE.09149070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Blacksheep was administered by Fair minded persons and organised in a = democratic manner with freedom of expression. >From what G3XBM implied Yahoo membership would not be the case, one = reason why he wanted the move. That is what he said, not my words. = Cannot say I have heard you active on the LF/MF bands, silent operator. g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Alberto di Bene=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status On 6/3/2012 6:56 PM, Tony wrote:=20 Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances.=20 Can't the same be done also by the Blacksheep moderator (or = administrator, if this term is more acceptable) ? Censorship (or the lack of thereof) does not depend on the technical = substrate, but just on the person who has the authority to perform it. 73 Alberto I2PHD ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01CD41AE.09149070 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Blacksheep was administered by Fair minded = persons and=20 organised in a democratic manner with freedom of = expression.
From what G3XBM implied Yahoo = membership would not be=20 the case, one reason why he wanted the move. That is what he said, = not my=20 words. Cannot say I have heard you active on the LF/MF bands, silent=20 operator.
 
g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Alberto di = Bene=20
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 = 5:08 PM
Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: = Reflector=20 status

On 6/3/2012 6:56 PM, Tony wrote:=20
<snip>
Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances. =
<snip>
 
Can't the = same be done=20 also by the Blacksheep moderator (or administrator, if this term is = more=20 acceptable) ?
Censorship (or the lack of thereof) does not depend = on the=20 technical substrate, but just on the person who
has the authority = to=20 perform it.

73  Alberto =20 I2PHD

 ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01CD41AE.09149070--