Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5EF713800008D; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 04:19:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSUm-0001Lv-6N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:18:36 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSUl-0001Lm-MT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:18:35 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbSUj-0005Rt-VN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:18:34 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AugJABxvzE9cF/bI/2dsb2JhbABFiX2ofASBJoEIghMFAQEEAQgBAQNJAiYGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYd1CbYbixEgLoIsgxYDiA2FMJB+hlaCYIFX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,712,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="383120733" Received: from host-92-23-246-200.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.246.200]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 09:18:32 +0100 Message-ID: <004101cd422a$a098f1d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FCC6CA2.2060702@telus.net> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:18:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: John Please take note. There is an ever increasing case across the world to retain Blacksheep for those of us actually working on the lower frequencies in QSO daily. Quick reports, alerts, and small attachments. No conflict, let those so inclined towards Yahoo get on with Uploading pictures, using central storage archieves and what ever else they want to do. de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:446848064:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60554fcc6f933e13 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none John Please take note. There is an ever increasing case across the world to retain Blacksheep for those of us actually working on the lower frequencies in QSO daily. Quick reports, alerts, and small attachments. No conflict, let those so inclined towards Yahoo get on with Uploading pictures, using central storage archieves and what ever else they want to do. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gibbs" To: ; Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:06 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep > I'm with Clive on this idea.... > > > Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo > for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be > archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the > search function and files section of Yahoo. > > > Regards, John / VE7BDQ > > >