Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B858B3800009C; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 06:04:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb7f8-0005c9-FD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:03:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sb7f8-0005c0-25 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:03:54 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb7f6-0000cL-ER for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:03:52 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIJAB42y09cF/B0/2dsb2JhbABFsncEgSSBCIITBQEBBAEIAQEDSQImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAQklFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh3UJqEeNDYsRToIsgxYDiA2FMJB+hlaCYA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,707,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="383058930" Received: from host-92-23-240-116.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.240.116]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 03 Jun 2012 11:03:51 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01cd4170$2c0b19c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <5804C62C151B4755A82A3AA96D1B3749@JimPC> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 10:03:49 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jim They all went to Yahoo like a Flock of Sheep with no advantage for the majority. Blacksheep reflector in conjunction with Dropbox for large atachments has worked very well. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 9:28 AM Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: LF: Re: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:443988736:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61894fcb36bf3b1f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Jim They all went to Yahoo like a Flock of Sheep with no advantage for the majority. Blacksheep reflector in conjunction with Dropbox for large atachments has worked very well. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 9:28 AM Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep > Dear John, LF Groups > > --- In rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "John" wrote: > > > > Am I right in thinking that most people have transitioned to the new group > > here, and that I can ask the sysop to delete the remaining addresses on > > the list? > > At the moment, there are two RSGB LF Groups, with postings that overlap but > are not the same. This is a confusing situation leaving you wondering which > group to send replies to, etc. So I think one or the other needs to be > deleted, I guess you have to delete the one that will upset the fewest > people... > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > >