Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BECC13800008C; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:13:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SRjHo-0001GG-K9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:13:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SRjHo-0001G7-6P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:13:00 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SRjHl-0000MU-QQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:12:59 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q48CCu4v017770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 May 2012 09:42:56 -0230 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:42:56 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org cc: "YV7MAE Maritn A. Echazarreta D." In-Reply-To: <4FA90708.2030008@charter.net> Message-ID: References: <4FA50263.60800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA50506.8020108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <34D85CC545AF41C0A2E711E1199477F5@White> <4FA71E6C.8030309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA780BD.30507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA8DC60.6010002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA90708.2030008@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks John and sorry for blaming you -- but I'm sure an XES will make it down there soon however. 73 Joe On Tue, 8 May 2012, John Andrews wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: bf9cd6b3d49c805062abf73a1027fea8 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA - Venezuela opening Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:441825216:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d94fa90e060e5c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks John and sorry for blaming you -- but I'm sure an XES will make=20 it down there soon however. 73 Joe On Tue, 8 May 2012, John Andrews wrote: > Joe, > > It wasn't WD2XES -- I was only on from 0115 to 0200. I believe that's an = "O",=20 > probably from WD2XKO. The frequency calibration on that screen looks a li= ttle=20 > high. > > But, congratulations on the DX! > > John, W1TAG > > On 5/8/2012 7:29 AM, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: >>=20 >> A new continent... Horray! Well done, Martin and Stefan. >>=20 >> And congrats to John. That was probably his S from XES. >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, 8 May 2012, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi Joe, Martin, LF, >>>=20 >>> Now it looks like you're coming through in YV! A clear NA (some). 5:30 >>> UTC. I also see a very clear signal on 778. Maybe a "S" in DFCW. >>> CFH/Halifax is a good indicator for your path. It has interesting QSB >>> and very good S/N. Probably you will be even stronger in a hour, if >>> propagation will be about similar than yesterday... >>>=20 >>> 73, Stefan >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Am 08.05.2012 00:50, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>> Congrats to Dex and Martin and also to you Stefan for your part >>>> in helping with this grabber! >>>>=20 >>>> NA is QRV again tonight. >>>>=20 >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>>=20 >>>> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Looks like there is a trace at 137.7776 kHz arround 7...7:30 UTC. >>>>> Very weak but with some imagination i can see a X and a K. More >>>>> proof is needed but is this the first trace of an LF amateur in YV?? >>>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html >>>>>=20 >>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions = at >>>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_201= 2.php >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.= php >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4984 - Release Date: 05/07/12= =20 >> 18:34:00 >>=20 > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php