Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4DDEB380000A2; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXbZz-0006iN-33 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:12:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXbZx-0006iE-LY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:12:01 +0100 Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXbZv-0001jY-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:12:00 +0100 Received: from pd4ml1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.141]) by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 24 May 2012 11:11:53 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=zu4PKjlF+9DoPrG/TPTQ4CC8dREy1gI1uGhqrRhVwqE= c=1 sm=1 a=uDrkn7Hy-jUA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=/5CVHwnFpRsx0VdEaeOHKw==:17 a=_Dj-zB-qAAAA:8 a=SjUITXnbBhLUwRzfb98A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO MaynePC) ([24.108.61.69]) by pd4ml1so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with SMTP; 24 May 2012 11:11:53 -0600 Message-ID: From: To: References: <9C328DE2-E025-4A9D-B275-ED69EDD75289@gmail.com> <4FBE65E8.2030000@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <4FBE65E8.2030000@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:11:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Honestly, this move is a no brainer IMHO. I agree. In addition, there will be a ton of storage space for files, photos etc, not to mention the ability to search archival postings. Steve [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [24.71.223.10 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:455635296:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554fbe6c333421 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none > Honestly, this move is a no brainer IMHO. I agree. In addition, there will be a ton of storage space for files, photos etc, not to mention the ability to search archival postings. Steve WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl