Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1D2683804B35B; Wed, 2 May 2012 14:35:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SPeC1-0000XU-Mu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:22:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SPeC1-0000XK-7b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:22:25 +0100 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPeBz-0004Bh-Er for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:22:24 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.22.90]) by mwinf5d43 with ME id 56NJ1j00K1wdCkq036NJwn; Wed, 02 May 2012 20:22:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <6AF9FA27D80A49C4BC95967CB103D19D@AGB> <4F9EDBDF.3030604@talktalk.net> <4CCEC10479A04AFF91E1823373CA6C00@AGB> <4F9F1437.6060401@talktalk.net> In-Reply-To: <4F9F1437.6060401@talktalk.net> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 19:22:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120502-0, 02/05/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: If you leave the garden gate a-jar that should tidy the signal up on its way past ? -44 . that's the Op reported level ? so could be -50 / -52 in wspr levels .. should be able to loose 45% , but don't forget the s/n is the average over the time line , so for a full capture, you could be ~~ 10 db over the limit ?? [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.2 TVD_SUBJ_ACC_NUM Subject has spammy looking monetary reference 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d63ea50e288c5ecb9bd7a86eeabe94f2 Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re:_LF:_WANTED__8KHz____OP4H___O?= =?utf-8?Q?PERA___TESTER=E2=80=99S?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD2898.E2241D10" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:454717696:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410d4fa17e575107 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD2898.E2241D10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you leave the garden gate a-jar that should tidy the signal up = on its way past ? -44 . that's the Op reported level ? so could be -50 / -52 in = wspr levels .. should be able to loose 45% , but don't forget the = s/n is the average over the time line , so for a full capture, you = could be ~~ 10 db over the limit ?? Are you using a pre-amp etc of just directly into the sound card = Ed, ?. some questions in the news group over filters etc , I think = one of the simple pre-amps may be the best option ?? Tnx -G.. From: qrss=20 Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 11:37 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: WANTED 8KHz OP4H OPERA TESTER=E2=80=99S OK Graham Well you wouldn't want to radiate an untidy signal.=20 Second decode was -44dB, about 10dB / Noise in 46mHz. Signal level = varied and about 20% data lost in a block, XYL re arranged the = configuration of the dining table antenna, they just don't understand! 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 30/04/2012 22:23, Graham wrote:=20 Tnx Ed, Steady carrier, that should be one of the advantages of Op on 8Khz = , no real problems with sound card 's and frequency stability !=20 Look's like you may have some signals from PA soon , not sure = what's happened to all the UK Tx stations , I know there was a = problem with having to inform the met-office ..=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD2898.E2241D10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If you leave the  garden  gate  a-jar that = should  tidy=20 the  signal up on its way  past ?
 
-44 . that's  the  Op  reported level ? so  = could =20 be    -50 / -52 in  wspr  levels .. = should  be=20 able to  loose  45% , but  don't  forget the  = s/n is=20 the  average  over the  time line , so for a full  = capture,=20 you  could be  ~~ 10 db over the limit ??
 
Are you  using  a  pre-amp  etc  of = just =20 directly  into the  sound card Ed, ?.  some  = questions in=20 the  news  group  over  filters etc , I think  = one of=20 the  simple  pre-amps  may  be the  best option = ??
 
Tnx -G..

From: qrss
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WANTED 8KHz OP4H OPERA = TESTER=E2=80=99S

OK Graham

Well you wouldn't want to radiate an = untidy=20 signal.

Second decode was -44dB, about 10dB / Noise in 46mHz. = Signal=20 level varied and about 20% data lost in a block, XYL re arranged the=20 configuration of the dining table antenna, they just don't = understand!

73=20 Eddie G3ZJO

On 30/04/2012 22:23, Graham wrote:=20
Tnx Ed,
 
Steady carrier, that should be  one of the  advantages = of=20 Op  on  8Khz , no  real  problems with  sound = card=20 's  and  frequency  stability !
Look's  like  you  may have  some  = signals =20 from PA soon , not  sure  what's happened  to  all = the  UK  Tx  stations , I know  there was a =20 problem  with  having to  inform  the =20 met-office  ..


------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD2898.E2241D10--