MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1336230768.3737.10.camel@g4gvw-high-grade>
References: <CE6BEA9F709A4B55A925720C011F39CD@AGB>
	<4F99A446.4080400@o2.co.uk>
	<1335704544.3002.5.camel@g4gvw-high-grade>
	<005501cd2919$aeeb9b90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
	<1336230768.3737.10.camel@g4gvw-high-grade>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 17:34:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA8k23Sev70pqw-6aY5sqH3=feHXYop3_4RqCwSd_BL98sjwog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d249.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154fa556f05496
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Can you resend the attachment in a format we can actually read.
.PDF would be ideal, but what's wrong with .doc

Andy
G4JNT


On 5 May 2012 16:12, pat <g4gvw@aol.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Mal, actually the CLUED is just a little more complicated than just 4
> years as a qualifying period. A 10 year period can apply to some aspects
> as you will read in the attachment. The attachment is from a journal
> called Local Government Lawyer and is guidance to those professionally
> engaged in such matters. The appropriate law books have this in more
> detailed and technical form.
>
> Trust this will clarify the position.
>
> If any have problems with .odt I can provide .doc or .rtf
> (in a world of open systems, who needs windows and gates or other
> "Bloatware Inc" products)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:44 +0000, mal hamilton wrote:
>> 4 years is the requirement NOT 10 years
>>
>> de G3KEV
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "pat" <g4gvw@aol.com>
>> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 1:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info
>>
>>
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > It's worth bearing in mind that it is possible to obtain a Certificate
>> > of Lawful Development for Existing Use - CLUED. The general proviso
>> > being that you must be able to substantiate that the "existing use" ha=
s
>> > persisted for a period of 10 years. Always worth investigating as the
>> > granting of such a certificate is "evidence-based" and not supposed to
>> > be at the whim of an official.
>> >
>> > 73
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 20:38 +0100, Peter Dodd wrote:
>> > > Hi Graham,
>> > > How the mast is fixed into the ground is irrelevant. The planning
>> > > permission is just for the mast. There is no distinction between
>> > > permanent and temporary in the planning laws to my knowledge,
>> > >
>> > > In the past some have tried to circumvent the planning restriction b=
y
>> > > having a portable (mast on trailer) arrangement but I don't think th=
at
>> > > works.
>> > >
>> > > I live in rather a stuffy private estate and I got permission on
>> > > appeal on the grounds that the mast was fold-over and I agreed to on=
ly
>> > > have it raised at night. Over the years the people who made all the
>> > > fuss about the antenna have since died and I put it up when I like.
>> > > Whether this is due to indifference or fear that the curse of the
>> > > radio mast will strike again is not known.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Peter, G3LDO
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 26/04/2012 18:53, Graham wrote:
>> > > > Can anyone =A0advise on the =A0planning =A0relevance =A0/ requirem=
ents to
>> > > > these =A0questions =A0, with =A0regards to =A0Ae pole =A0at the =
=A0bottom of the
>> > > > garden
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground?
>> > > > 2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base?
>> > > > 3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment
>> > > > resulted in the erection of an entirely new mast,
>> > > >
>> > > > what =A0is the =A0relevance =A0of the =A0base =A0being concreted i=
nto the
>> > > > ground ?
>> > > >
>> > > > I assume the =A0question =A0of =A0detaching =A0the =A0pole from th=
e =A0base =A0is
>> > > > one =A0of =A0permanent =A0or temporary =A0structure ?
>> > > >
>> > > > replacing =A0like with =A0like =A0would =A0not =A0be classed as =
=A0a =A0new mast ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Tnx -G
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > __________________________________________________________________=
__
>> > > >
>> > > > No virus found in this message.
>> > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> > > > Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4959 - Release Date:
>> > > > 04/25/12
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> 73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK