Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8AE4B3800008D; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:11:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXpb0-0002ww-Fu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:10:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXpaz-0002wi-Kg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:10:01 +0100 Received: from outbound-queue-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net ([212.11.70.35]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXpaw-0004RW-Jc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:10:00 +0100 Received: from outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (bonnie.gradwell.net [212.11.70.2]) by outbound-queue-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762E6227B6 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:09:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from ctuash.plus.com (HELO LABHB) (212.159.90.113) (smtp-auth username ashford, mechanism login) by outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (qpsmtpd/0.83) with ESMTPA; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:09:54 +0100 From: "Hugh_M0WYE" To: References: <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:09:53 +0100 Message-ID: <7E5E863BD2D24F05ABA77F91B091D446@ctu.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Thread-Index: Ac05y1pQE373v0x3RDa3N9LxKq0tXgAfujNA X-Gradwell-MongoId: 4fbf3e52.9f13-779a-2 X-Gradwell-Auth-Method: smtpauth X-Gradwell-Auth-Credentials: ashford X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Group, I am another "lurker", but have greatly appreciated the LF reflector over the years. I also have a Yahoo account and follow other radio-related groups on there, so I would be quite happy if the reflector moved onto Yahoo. [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.11.70.35 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ea325ff0d4a9c53a3010c97c9e919a12 Subject: RE: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0039_01CD3A56.25F45360" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:488054976:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60594fbf3ec158aa X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01CD3A56.25F45360 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Group, I am another "lurker", but have greatly appreciated the LF reflector over the years. I also have a Yahoo account and follow other radio-related groups on there, so I would be quite happy if the reflector moved onto Yahoo. 73 Hugh M0WYE _____ From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of g3zjo Sent: 24 May 2012 17:34 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Hi Roger Why not go for it and start it yourself. We know some will not move so it will be an additional facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no childish sulking. Eddie On 23/05/2012 22:51, Roger Lapthorn wrote: With the latest outage (5 days already) may I again suggest that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group? In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or problems with any group to which I belong or moderate. Instead they have had these advantages: 1. Messages can be read on the web if preferred (saves cluttered in-boxes) 2. There is rarely a delay of more than a few minutes before messages are received. 3. All messages are archived and searchable. 4. Large files can be stored. 5. Photos can be stored - 100Gigs worth. 6. Links can be stored/shared 7. Videos can be stored. 8. Polls can be run. 9. Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a number of moderators to speed up the process) 10. Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances. 11. Spam messages can be filtered 12. Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc) The advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply cannot understand why the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems this week it is surely time. To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or whatever) would take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all interested members here would take about a day at most. All you need is to agree a group name, who owns it, who can moderate posts and some basic group ground rules/FAQs. Please, think about it again. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5019 - Release Date: 05/24/12 ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01CD3A56.25F45360 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello = Group,

I am another “lurker”, = but have greatly appreciated the LF reflector over the years. =

I also have a Yahoo account and = follow other radio-related groups on there, so I would be quite happy if the = reflector moved onto Yahoo.

73

Hugh = M0WYE

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of g3zjo
Sent: 24 May 2012 = 17:34
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead = .....PLEASE

 

Hi Roger

Why not go for it and start it yourself.
We know some will not move so it will be an additional facility. Please = make sure it is has no taboo, frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects = rules, and no childish sulking.

Eddie

On 23/05/2012 22:51, Roger = Lapthorn wrote:

With the latest outage (5 days already) may I = again suggest that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group?

In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or = problems with any group to which I belong or moderate.

Instead they have had these advantages:

  1. Messages can be read on the web if = preferred (saves cluttered in-boxes)
  2. There is rarely a delay of more than a = few minutes before messages are received.
  3. All messages are archived and = searchable.
  4. Large files can be = stored.
  5. Photos can be stored - 100Gigs = worth.
  6. Links can be = stored/shared
  7. Videos can be = stored.
  8. Polls can be = run.
  9. Messages can be vetted if preferred (by = a number of moderators to speed up the = process)
  10. Difficult members can be banned in = exceptional circumstances.
  11. Spam messages can be = filtered
  12. Calendars can be set up (for sked times, = news of tests etc)

The advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I = simply cannot understand why the change hasn't made years ago. With the = problems this week it is surely time.

To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or = whatever) would take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all interested members here = would take about a day at most. All you need is to agree a group name, who = owns it, who can moderate posts and some basic group ground rules/FAQs.

Please, think about it again.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5019 - Release Date: = 05/24/12

 

------=_NextPart_000_0039_01CD3A56.25F45360--