Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 98038380000A1; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXhXE-00014J-6R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:33:36 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXhXD-00014A-Mr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:33:35 +0100 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62] helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXhXB-0003Ad-Ik for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:33:34 +0100 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386C9929 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:30 -0400 (EDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=pobox.com Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=vRMO7mrsvTXrpknD9yUjLhdr5CI=; b=Shm1Zb QcU2bZVAQnpbHWD9rob+f4z5EhnvE8MGsebJUBJIElBF3WglG+N0bELinEvgagmI L4W5FSftyE4rI7mEEvAEdCZfWO5wbAqAhTMD/+dgLYp5oy5LzOwe6WgE80cw/8ZA 8GZWrHVyal0w9EYyuQpDXfV73HMLvtXYnQVZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date :to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qkn03JS2TeC8ZUYQLxCwZMdsZ+SarcK6 2kuIvTeuQzfMWUGypcvqbR4x6MYIJN+WDfMVc7W682rEUi04adw1LheI8KGoJIeG lP5BHwsx5E3SFzW6kQtBUSK7vHbNBZnhPXm1tT0LSQfvoGtbJBWQo9OJITPWDiDi aaz5ndui4pI= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A19D9928 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fast-one.pobox.com (unknown [71.163.225.192]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BFB139927 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20120524192418.03a9a868@pobox.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:12 -0400 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Nan and Sandy Sanders In-Reply-To: References: <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> <4FBE6D2A.6000907@usa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DD2547FC-A5F8-11E1-9D22-E981AF15ED39-16367692!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Another lurker here, one of the AMRAD LF crew. I have been on this list several years but only post every 2 or 3 years. Just trying to keep up with LF. Sandy WB5MMB At 06:16 PM 5/24/2012, you wrote: >On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alberto di Bene wrote: > > Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning that each > > request for membership should be > > accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining why that > > membership is requested. > > Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to accept it or not. > > I suppose the same is done > > presently with the Majordomo mailer. > > > > And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a point... then > > the moderator can accept the individual, > > but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every message from him > > must be examined by the moderator(s) > > before being published. The moderation status can be removed > after a couple > > of legitimate messages from the guy, > > showing that he is not a troll or spammer. > >I see where you're coming from, but there's probably more than me on >here who are just lurkers, and we'd be excluded because we don't post. >I've been signed up to the list for months (nearly a year?) purely >because I'm interested in LF. I don't have the equipment or the space >for LF operation but I've followed the achievements that have been >made between some of the members on this list and it always makes for >interesting reading. > >Running a mailing list isn't difficult, but Yahoo groups is probably >the best way to go. Those who want to get the messages by e-mail >notice no difference, and there's the occasionally useful extras if >needed. > >My 2p worth! > >Andy >M0VKG > >-- >Andy Smith >+44 7848 958821 : http://m0vkg.org.uk/ : http://andys.org.uk/ [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [74.115.168.62 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:462673664:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m021.2 ; domain : pobox.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4fbec58a255d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Another lurker here, one of the AMRAD LF crew. I have been on this list several years but only post every 2 or 3 years. Just trying to keep up with LF. Sandy WB5MMB At 06:16 PM 5/24/2012, you wrote: >On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alberto di Bene wrote: > > Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning that each > > request for membership should be > > accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining why that > > membership is requested. > > Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to accept it or not. > > I suppose the same is done > > presently with the Majordomo mailer. > > > > And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a point... then > > the moderator can accept the individual, > > but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every message from him > > must be examined by the moderator(s) > > before being published. The moderation status can be removed > after a couple > > of legitimate messages from the guy, > > showing that he is not a troll or spammer. > >I see where you're coming from, but there's probably more than me on >here who are just lurkers, and we'd be excluded because we don't post. >I've been signed up to the list for months (nearly a year?) purely >because I'm interested in LF. I don't have the equipment or the space >for LF operation but I've followed the achievements that have been >made between some of the members on this list and it always makes for >interesting reading. > >Running a mailing list isn't difficult, but Yahoo groups is probably >the best way to go. Those who want to get the messages by e-mail >notice no difference, and there's the occasionally useful extras if >needed. > >My 2p worth! > >Andy >M0VKG > >-- >Andy Smith >+44 7848 958821 : http://m0vkg.org.uk/ : http://andys.org.uk/