Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 47E27380000AA; Sun, 6 May 2012 10:29:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SR2Rz-00057v-2e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 15:28:39 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SR2Ry-00057m-Lp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 15:28:38 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SR2Rw-00011o-7k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 15:28:37 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.14]) by mwinf5d02 with ME id 6eUZ1j00M0JMiBE03eUZ5C; Sun, 06 May 2012 16:28:34 +0200 Message-ID: <5628465F1047462D972E08908B6F4441@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <1336308788.2541.16.camel@g4gvw-high-grade> In-Reply-To: <1336308788.2541.16.camel@g4gvw-high-grade> Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 15:28:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120506-0, 06/05/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: All . I would say bad bill has slipped computing over 20 years , from where it could be ... only now are the risc processors , decedents of the home computing of the 1980's just starting to make the headlines .. why ? hardware and battery life considerations apparently are a problem .. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: Re: LF: Open Sauce Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:508589120:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60574fa68ae22bcc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none All . I would say bad bill has slipped computing over 20 years , from where it could be ... only now are the risc processors , decedents of the home computing of the 1980's just starting to make the headlines .. why ? hardware and battery life considerations apparently are a problem .. G.. Has anyone tried this >> http://www.netbsd.org/ ?? -------------------------------------------------- From: "pat" Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 1:53 PM To: Subject: LF: Open Sauce > I was trying to make a point in a humourous fashion but seem to have > sparked an interesting debate. > > Operating systems may be judged in many ways - rather like a > multi-course meal. One's favourite dish may not suit the other diners > for a variety of reasons. > > What I strongly resent (and I hope more PC component manufacturers, > vendors and users will too) is the threat that Microsoft are attempting > in their quest for dominance. It is a restrictive practice and the thin > end of an insidious wedge intended to remove competitiveness. It will > also in the opinion of many industry pundits remove an incentive to > further development of personal computing and connectivity. Arguments > that running virtual machines within Windows are not an answer. > > Strangely, it is reported that Microsoft are major contributors to the > Linux kernel! One wonders why? > > > -- > 73 es gd dx de Pat G4GVW, Nr Felixstowe, East Coast, UK > >