Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ADEB238000094; Mon, 7 May 2012 05:13:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SRJzf-00039A-4E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 10:12:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SRJze-000391-NC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 10:12:34 +0100 Received: from filter02.i-online.fr ([195.200.78.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJzd-0004Ar-0z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 10:12:33 +0100 Received: from smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com ([195.200.78.13]) by filter02.i-online.fr (IceWarp 10.2.2) with ESMTP (SSL) id ROT54226 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 11:12:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 14545 invoked by uid 507); 7 May 2012 11:12:28 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (john.rabson@numeo.fr@217.67.155.178) by smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com with SMTP; 7 May 2012 11:12:28 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: John Rabson X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <007201cd2bac$dddba0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:12:31 +0200 Message-Id: <510E35A9-2ACB-4E8D-9159-1980842677C0@numeo.fr> References: <4F97E9C2.9030000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7B23411450514A5CB804E6D2C65A1876@JimPC> <006601cd2ba5$30f197b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <007201cd2bac$dddba0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 6 May 2012, at 19:22CEST, mal hamilton wrote: > I was wondering when you would SURFACE and appreciate your problem but the > simple solution for a dedicated underground Pipe chaser is to Move QTH. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:406165664:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60194fa7924b6422 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 6 May 2012, at 19:22CEST, mal hamilton wrote: > I was wondering when you would SURFACE and appreciate your problem but the > simple solution for a dedicated underground Pipe chaser is to Move QTH. Not always feasible. John F5VLF