Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D9E0D38000099; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:22:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SaCo3-0006wj-W7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 22:21:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SaCo3-0006wa-Eb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 22:21:19 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SaCo1-0005sq-9B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 22:21:18 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYBAKLfx09OlnXn/2dsb2JhbAANN4VNr14BAYIHAQEBAQMjJkAJAgkIAwEBAQEJHgMCAg8CNQkIEwYCAQGHeQOmMIhiC4lQixEahBqBEgOVGJJUgV4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,694,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="393040201" Received: from host-78-150-117-231.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.117.231]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 31 May 2012 22:21:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4FC7E0C4.70305@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 22:21:08 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <02bb01cd3eb1$c4cb1730$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <1338444302.19906.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <18D068A53AF74F56BF8AFDCCAB65CC62@AGB> <1338488029.92944.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <4FC7CD16.1060809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC7D427.20300@psk31.plus.com> <47B0447D596D4F959D30E29C647726F6@AGB> In-Reply-To: <47B0447D596D4F959D30E29C647726F6@AGB> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yep, I will go with that,. It didn't take us long at all did it.:-) Personally I use the Unwin (Stanley) dictionary at times, or seem to when I read something I have written. Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 7a5eab5982daca5912e6e97333848fe5 Subject: Re: LF: QRSS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000305030402040006030204" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:513110112:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad34fc7e1031841 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000305030402040006030204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yep, I will go with that,. It didn't take us long at all did it.:-) Personally I use the Unwin (Stanley) dictionary at times, or seem to when I read something I have written. Eddie On 31/05/2012 21:42, Graham wrote: > Just realised the missing word is ''Sequentially'' > ''QRSS and 12WPM Sequentially '' > > *From:* Graham > *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:37 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: QRSS > > and also > .... that would be a 3 mode beacon then ? need a Boolean > expression to define it ? > > *From:* g3zjo > *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:27 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: QRSS > > Hee hee, the English language. and it looks like the German > translation says the same. > > Pete's message reads fine, BUT add an also and its crystal clear. > > QRSS and also 12WPM > > Ediie > > On 31/05/2012 21:12, Graham wrote: >> QRSS and 12WPM >> According to Mr google Pete has one of these >> besondere >> doppelter Geschwindigkeit Leuchtfeuer QRSS und 12 Wörter pro Minute >> just hope Mr google is right ... and not based on the >> Monty-python Hungarian translation book .. >> G. >> >> *From:* Stefan Schäfer >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2012 8:57 PM >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> *Subject:* LF: QRSS >> >> >> Am 31.05.2012 20:13, schrieb M0FMT: >>> Hi Graham >>> I will digest your mail and thanks for so much info. I have a beacon >>> that runs on 500kc/s it is not in the Opera band. It is currently at >>> about 10Watts O/P to an inverted "L" up about 35ft x 128ft lng, >>> running QRSS and 12WPM. >> >> 12 WPM (=60 BPM) , is that QRSS? I remember my CW exam which was in >> 60 BPM and it was quite stressing!! :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5036 - Release Date: 05/31/12 >> > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5036 - Release Date: 05/31/12 > --------------000305030402040006030204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yep, I will go with that,. It didn't take us long at all did it. :-)

Personally I use the Unwin (Stanley) dictionary at times, or seem to when I read something I have written.

Eddie

On 31/05/2012 21:42, Graham wrote:
Just realised  the  missing  word is  ''Sequentially''      
 
''QRSS and 12WPM   Sequentially ''  

From: Graham
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS

and also
 
....   that  would  be a   3  mode  beacon  then ?   need a  Boolean  expression  to  define  it  ? 
 

 
From: g3zjo
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS

Hee hee, the English language. and it looks like the German translation says the same.

Pete's message reads fine, BUT add an also and its crystal clear.

QRSS and also 12WPM

Ediie

On 31/05/2012 21:12, Graham wrote:
QRSS and 12WPM
 
According  to  Mr  google  Pete  has  one  of these  >>  besondere doppelter Geschwindigkeit Leuchtfeuer QRSS und 12 Wörter pro Minute
 
just hope  Mr google is  right ...  and not  based on the  Monty-python  Hungarian translation book ..
 
G.
 

Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 8:57 PM
Subject: LF: QRSS


Am 31.05.2012 20:13, schrieb M0FMT:
 
Hi Graham
 
I will digest your mail and thanks for so much info. I have a beacon that runs on 500kc/s it is not in the Opera band. It is currently at about 10Watts O/P to an inverted "L" up about 35ft x 128ft lng, running QRSS and 12WPM.

12 WPM (=60 BPM) , is that QRSS? I remember my CW exam which was in 60 BPM and it was quite stressing!! :-)

73, Stefan

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5036 - Release Date: 05/31/12


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5036 - Release Date: 05/31/12


--------------000305030402040006030204--