Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B73D138000087; Thu, 31 May 2012 16:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SaBtF-00053E-Qn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:22:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SaBtF-000533-E5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:22:37 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SaBtD-0005Ie-J2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 21:22:36 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYBAE7Sx08CZMkC/2dsb2JhbAANN4VNr14BAYIHAQEBAQMjDwEFEUALCQsEAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTCAEBrjGSO4EjiW6CMIIEgRIDlRiSVA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,694,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="373966122" Received: from host-2-100-201-2.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([2.100.201.2]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 31 May 2012 21:22:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4FC7D307.3050603@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:22:31 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <02bb01cd3eb1$c4cb1730$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <1338444302.19906.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <18D068A53AF74F56BF8AFDCCAB65CC62@AGB> <1338488029.92944.YahooMailNeo@web171606.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <97F0E98E40814C45B796CFAF1351D46C@AGB> <4FC7CDF7.1090909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC7CDF7.1090909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan :-) I haven't looked this up but as far as I am concerned they are the same. Aerial is the English 'early days of radio' term from when Radios were Wirelesses. Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: Ae! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:493211552:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154fc7d3475acc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan :-) I haven't looked this up but as far as I am concerned they are the same. Aerial is the English 'early days of radio' term from when Radios were Wirelesses. Eddie On 31/05/2012 21:00, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Hmm, maybe someone from the UK can explain the difference between > aerial and antenna? Is there a difference? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5036 - Release Date: 05/31/12 > >