Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D0CE6380000A5; Tue, 29 May 2012 14:13:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SZQuL-0004CC-3e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 19:12:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SZQuK-0004C3-Mr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 19:12:36 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SZQuI-0002aD-RM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 19:12:35 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.104] (p548D2607.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.38.7]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M53tq-1RotEF1sje-00zW96; Tue, 29 May 2012 20:12:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC51191.8060004@legal-medicine.de> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:12:33 +0200 From: pws User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.1.16 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FC39CF3.7020701@legal-medicine.de> <003a01cd3cee$0e74a1a0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> In-Reply-To: <003a01cd3cee$0e74a1a0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:EwFhMzP8VgNkuArv0k9t/+oT0re3mrtAzVivvvnnsHL 35EPai4jms14TdKYozIjRmi1/TnYQ/hRz1AZ16zMhD5GH4mqDQ nfwu+rvlUAht+CtpFOlWCvWiKe26JcTCMpAjwIGnSoybpsuECw tn0vn88o4P7bTO9MAI898Y4DIoj8hVxW3GBr1iQAoSq89caVQA +Fv5ake8Gt4PhjFymig6xF18FIS687gT8jIAJidAGUtMrMlVjY liWnNPlhax+9Cof/GrskPFrM+z2icFP3WmpjeTHgD+Ta3vQwF3 cN5AZGRcMqzPqZQkr6X9rLW1x/T0f7j8FsvG6kLJRpe1oYxi1O xNOlG4G4BWxyf7BiXHQQ= X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Clemens et al. Thanks for all those hints! Finally I think I've found it. It's somewhat trivial, should better write embarrassing (sic!). I used an old 9 Volts-block for testing. Since it ran out of voltage (<7 Volts) during the trials I changed over to a bundle of 8 AA-Cells. The effect now was nearly "invisible". [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.10 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:380330336:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554fc511d079c6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Hi Clemens et al. Thanks for all those hints! Finally I think I've found it. It's somewhat trivial, should better write embarrassing (sic!). I used an old 9 Volts-block for testing. Since it ran out of voltage (<7 Volts) during the trials I changed over to a bundle of 8 AA-Cells. The effect now was nearly "invisible". Using a new 9 Volts-block it reappears but not such strong. Strange. Adding some capacitors right over that battery of AA-cells I have to knock very strongly now until the effect is discernable. Touching the battery does not show any further interferences. Made some screenshots, distance of both probes approx. 1 m (cave, big!). The old e-field probe running a BF981: http://www.df3lp.de/misc/rx/Left_BF981.png Images: http://df3lp.de/misc/rx/e-field_probe.png The new INA111 balanced probe: http://www.df3lp.de/misc/rx/Right_INA111.png Greetings from Kiel es tu, Peter, df3lp