Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B85A93800009C; Sat, 26 May 2012 05:04:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SYCuE-0002jD-If for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 10:03:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SYCuE-0002j4-3e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 10:03:26 +0100 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SYCuC-0001S5-56 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 10:03:24 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAMObwE9OlmQ8/2dsb2JhbAANN7g1AQEBAQNJQAsEBQsECSUPAkYTCAEBwC2LAoIpgxYDlRaSUYFVIA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,661,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="387239342" Received: from host-78-150-100-60.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.100.60]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 26 May 2012 10:03:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4FC09C56.40006@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 10:03:18 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hey Graham I have a whole collection of BR68's some are dated some are not, best thing to make sure you were up to date was to chose by how yellow the paper had become. Now its better to refer to Section 2 Terms, conditions and limitations document for the UK. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.239 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 85c54099682e8e65d9e25bf804a68673 Subject: Re: LF: Q What are the permitted suffixes to the call these days ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020409030608040006070905" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:456311744:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb4fc09cb62218 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020409030608040006070905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey Graham I have a whole collection of BR68's some are dated some are not, best thing to make sure you were up to date was to chose by how yellow the paper had become. Now its better to refer to Section 2 Terms, conditions and limitations document for the UK. First even official Beacons in the UK do not sign /B and no reference is made in T c & l doc as far as I can see. All other suffixes are merely recommendations and are:- Alternative Address may use /A Temporary Location may use /P Mobile Location may use /M Maritime Mobile may use /MM Aeronautical Mobile I bet these days 'could' be possible T c & l state 'Without prejudice to Clause 1 of this License... shall not....in any Aircraft or Airborne Vehicle." Eddie G3ZJO On 26/05/2012 00:21, Graham wrote: > Q What are the permitted suffixes to the call these days ? > Are /P Portable /M Mobile /B Beacon , Now the only > suffixes in use ? > The MM maritime mobile and AM Aeronautical Mobile are now > grouped as / M ? > and /A alternative is no longer valid ? > Tnx -G. > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5021 - Release Date: 05/25/12 > --------------020409030608040006070905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey Graham

I have a whole collection of BR68's some are dated some are not, best thing to make sure you were up to date was to chose by how yellow the paper had become.

Now its better to refer to Section 2 Terms, conditions and limitations document for the UK.

First even official Beacons in the UK do not sign /B and no reference is made in T c & l doc as far as I can see.

All other suffixes are merely recommendations and are:-

Alternative Address may use /A
Temporary Location may use /P
Mobile Location may use /M
Maritime Mobile may use /MM

Aeronautical Mobile I bet these days 'could' be possible T c & l state 'Without prejudice to Clause 1 of this License... shall not....in any Aircraft or Airborne Vehicle."

Eddie G3ZJO


On 26/05/2012 00:21, Graham wrote:
Q  What are the  permitted  suffixes to the  call  these days  ?
 
Are   /P   Portable    /M   Mobile    /B    Beacon   , Now the  only  suffixes  in use ?
 
The  MM  maritime  mobile  and  AM  Aeronautical  Mobile  are  now  grouped  as  / M    ?
and  /A   alternative is no longer  valid ?
 
Tnx -G.

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5021 - Release Date: 05/25/12


--------------020409030608040006070905--