Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8C51A380000B2; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXvce-0004GW-DI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:36:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXvcd-0004GN-Lp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:36:07 +0100 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXvcb-00062K-QI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:36:06 +0100 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120525143604.HKKX28930.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:36:04 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.2] (really [82.5.252.56]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20120525143604.EUTC10211.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.2]> for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:36:04 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:35:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4FBFA6D6.30410.67E5223@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=uObrxnre4hsA:10 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=e2k30AX0Z0f06HneqJIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In the fog of discussion about a possible Yahoo group, one thing has been overlooked. Without this reflector, experimentation on VLF/LF would have been almost non-existent. It provides a very valuable forum for discussion, advice and skeds, as well as reassuring us all that there is someone out there listening. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [81.103.221.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: LF: Reflector Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:249883184:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d4fbf9936396e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none In the fog of discussion about a possible Yahoo group, one thing has been overlooked. Without this reflector, experimentation on VLF/LF would have been almost non-existent. It provides a very valuable forum for discussion, advice and skeds, as well as reassuring us all that there is someone out there listening. We all owe a debt of gratitude to those who have provided this reflector for many years. They have helped us achieve the most extraordinary feats over the years. Whether we change to a Yahoo Group is a matter for the group's users. If anyone wants to set up a group and =importantly= is prepared to keep it running for years to come, then that's fine. But please don't assume that those who selflessly run the Blacksheep system will want to run it. They deserve our thanks, not complaints. Mike, G3XDV ==========.