Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8089D380000A0; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:40:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXhd5-0001BY-6E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:39:39 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXhd4-0001BP-Op for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:39:38 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXhd3-0003DV-4B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:39:37 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4ONdanH006837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:39:36 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q4ONdaYI025080 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:39:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4FBEC66A.2070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 01:38:18 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> <4FBE6D2A.6000907@usa.net> <006b01cd39e2$0b66efe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <4FBEA22E.2020007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1411CA501261403BBD6CB75A773E19ED@AGB> <4FBEBF02.80608@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <4FBEBF02.80608@telus.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That's one thing. Generally i think we will loose some older members of this group when doing QSY. A non-availability of this reflector of 2%, is that *SUCH* a problem? IMHO the problem is the loss of activity on the band. We're focusing on neglibilities i think. Do we /have to/ QSY to stay trendy or keep up with the modern world? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 4d97240a623a26620214cd27feaa9f71 Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead ... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000306010305010009050307" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:356335168:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61864fbec6fc189b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000306010305010009050307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That's one thing. Generally i think we will loose some older members of this group when doing QSY. A non-availability of this reflector of 2%, is that *SUCH* a problem? IMHO the problem is the loss of activity on the band. We're focusing on neglibilities i think. Do we /have to/ QSY to stay trendy or keep up with the modern world? Odd... Am 25.05.2012 01:06, schrieb John Gibbs: > How does one get rid of all the advertising boxes on the yahoo group ?? > > Not a Yahoo user ... > > > 73 John / VE7BDQ > > > > > --------------000306010305010009050307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q4ONdanH006837 That's one thing.

Generally i think we will loose some older members of this group when doing QSY.

A non-availability of this reflector of 2%, is that SUCH a problem? IMHO the problem is the loss of activity on the band. We're focusing on neglibilities i think. Do we have to QSY to stay trendy or keep up with the modern world?

Odd...





Am 25.05.2012 01:06, schrieb John Gibbs:
How does one get rid of all the advertising boxes on the yahoo group ??=A0

Not a Yahoo user ...


73=A0 John / VE7BDQ=A0





--------------000306010305010009050307--