Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DA355380000BE; Thu, 24 May 2012 12:05:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXaVe-0005sI-Kn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:03:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXaVc-0005s9-6x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:03:28 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXaVZ-0001Iw-W6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:03:27 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6052ADC3F for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:03:17 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82F) with ESMTP id 488qeXqDN3520M01; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:03:13 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from imap01.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.1] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID497qeXqDN2654X01; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:03:13 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.1 IN dibene@usa.net imap01.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID497qeXqDN2654X01 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.55.17.172] by imap01.cms.usa.net (ESMTPSA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82G) with ESMTPSA id 478qeXqDm4128M21; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:03:12 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.55.17.172 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <4FBE5BBE.3040404@usa.net> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:03:10 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <9C328DE2-E025-4A9D-B275-ED69EDD75289@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9C328DE2-E025-4A9D-B275-ED69EDD75289@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120524-1, 05/24/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID478qeXqDN4128X21 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 5/24/2012 4:32 PM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > You can post to a Yahoo group by email or via the group website. Likewise you can receive posts as emails , a daily digest email or just look at posts on a group website which is what I prefer being a member of several Yahoo groups. Honestly, this move is a no brainer IMHO. Agreed. I manage three Yahoo groups, and the effort required is truly minimal, and you have all the advantages already reported by somebody else in a previous message. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [165.212.64.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 118b9e608370528226a3c3b3aedcdda0 Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040200050901030506090906" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:414757312:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d74fbe5c2c5b5b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040200050901030506090906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/24/2012 4:32 PM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > You can post to a Yahoo group by email or via the group website. Likewise you can receive posts as emails , a daily digest email or just look at posts on a group website which is what I prefer being a member of several Yahoo groups. Honestly, this move is a no brainer IMHO. Agreed. I manage three Yahoo groups, and the effort required is truly minimal, and you have all the advantages already reported by somebody else in a previous message. I have set Thunderbird so that it logs on automatically to the Yahoo groups I subscribe, download new emails, and shows them to me in my regular Inbox. The same is for posting / replying. I just press the Reply button of Thunderbird, exactly as I am doing now for the RSGB LF reflector. And, while it is rue that in the past years having an account at Yahoo meant being submerged of spam messages, today this is no more true. Yahoo took adequate measures against that, giving the numbers of complaints on the subject. Frankly, I don't see a single reason why to not migrate to an Yahoo groups. The sole fact of having a messages archive would overshadow any possible minor inconveniences there would be in the migration. But I am confident there would be none. My 2 cents. 73 Alberto I2PHD --------------040200050901030506090906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/24/2012 4:32 PM, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
You can post to a Yahoo group by email or via the gr=
oup website. Likewise you can receive posts as emails , a daily digest em=
ail or just look at posts on a group website which is what I prefer being=
 a member of several Yahoo groups. Honestly, this move is a no brainer IM=
HO. 
Agreed. I manage three Yahoo groups, and the effort required is truly minimal, and you have all the advantages already reported
by somebody else in a previous message.

I have set Thunderbird so that it logs on automatically to the Yahoo groups I subscribe, download new emails, and shows them to me
in my regular Inbox.=A0 The same is for posting / replying.=A0 I just press the Reply button of Thunderbird, exactly as I am doing now for the
RSGB LF reflector.

And, while it is rue that in the past years having an account at Yahoo meant being submerged of spam messages, today this is no more true.
Yahoo took adequate measures against that, giving the numbers of complaints on the subject.

Frankly, I don't see a single reason why to not migrate to an Yahoo groups.=A0 The sole fact of having a messages archive would overshado= w
any possible minor inconveniences there would be in the migration.=A0 But I am confident there would be none.

My 2 cents.

73=A0 Alberto=A0 I2PHD
=A0

--------------040200050901030506090906--