Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AA86C38001E90; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:38:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1STwPG-00045n-AU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:37:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1STwPF-00045e-SD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:37:49 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1STwPD-0005LW-Vj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:37:48 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q4EEbkUi012276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 16:37:47 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q4EEbl9j004445 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 16:37:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4FB11876.10208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:36:38 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FAFEA71.8030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00a601cd315a$ba5babc0$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <00a601cd315a$ba5babc0$4001a8c0@lark> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q4EEbkUi012276 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Alan, Markus, Jim, Warren, Hartmut, Ben, Laurence, Clemens, Roelof, LF! Perfect. Many thank for the big resonance to my query :-) The page of F1AFJ and the EZNEC file from Hartmut is very helpful, also the general explainations and links! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 138e3b341e0543401afa7e97ee054540 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Cardioid RX antenna for LF... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=CELL_PHONE_BOOST autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:388505216:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c94fb118ed169b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Alan, Markus, Jim, Warren, Hartmut, Ben, Laurence, Clemens,=20 Roelof, LF! Perfect. Many thank for the big resonance to my query :-) The page of F1AFJ and the EZNEC file from Hartmut is very helpful, also=20 the general explainations and links! OK, we'll start in this week and will see what comes out. At least the=20 loop will be installed and a cable to the RX. Then we will build a 1:3=20 transformer and just test what comes out if a 1k pot is used. I'm=20 looking forward to the results. Maybe a preamp will be needed but=20 hopefully we will get first impressions without one... Loop, cable, xfmr, ground rod, loop orientation, resistor, alignment...=20 These are the steps for the week... 73 to all, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.05.2012 00:36, schrieb Alan Melia: > Hi Stefam I am not sure about what you are doing so my comments may be = way > off target. If the loop is not tunes yes it will be high impedance like= a > short wire (much less than 1/4 wave) BUT Finbar did some experiments wi= th > K9AYs for NDB listening. He tuned the loop to resonance at the opposite= end > to the resistor, then he matched the feeder by tapping he tuning coil. = I > have buried on my machine somewhere Finbar's notes. You will be told "i= ts > not necessary to tune a K9AY but these are people who are looking at no= tes > or using it on MF/HF where the pick-up is a lot better and the impedanc= e is > lower. For narrow band reception tuning is always an advantage. > > As Roelof says Hartmutt used a K9AY, a two turn version, I think > > Alan > G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 6:08 PM > Subject: LF: Cardioid RX antenna for LF... > > > =20 >> Hello Group, >> >> I've just started to play a bit in EZNEC, trying to simulate a receive >> loop antenna for the new YV7MAE grabber. >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html ... still >> using a wire receive antenna with excellent results but now a >> directional antenna is needed. >> >> So i modelled a loop with a possible shape and a ground connection. Th= en >> i added a R on the far end of the source. The results of the elevation >> and 3D plot are surprising good. Maybe i have done a mistake in >> modelling? Optimal performance was obtained at R =3D 8 kOhm. This resu= lted >> in the best F/B and beamwidth... Results of ZENEC are here: >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/Cardioid%20for%20LF.png >> >> Any ideas, experiance or advice? >> >> I guess a preamp is needed when such a antenna is used. The typical 1:= 9 >> un-un does not look useful for me... >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> =20 > =20