Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2A68B380000BB; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:24:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1STCHr-0000kp-7J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1STCHq-0000kg-QB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:06 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1STCHo-0003VI-RN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:05 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBADNjrk9OlmGm/2dsb2JhbAANN7cNAQEBAQMyAQU6FwsJDwklDwJGEwgBAYgVukyLGYJigyYElX2BEZIZgVUF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,576,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="537892018" Received: from host-78-150-97-166.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.97.166]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 12 May 2012 14:23:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4FAE6436.70605@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:02 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FAE4932.3070000@psk31.plus.com> <4FAE5294.40200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FAE5294.40200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: XYL has already contributed to the Siberia fund.:-( Message transmission started 13:00 Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: 82Hz propagation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:338641312:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d94fae647949da X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none XYL has already contributed to the Siberia fund.:-( Message transmission started 13:00 Eddie On 12/05/2012 13:07, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Hi Eddie, > > Very good work, interesting!!! One day they will catch you and treat > you as a spy. Then the members of this group have to put some money > together to get you free again ;-) > > Looking forward to further results! :-) > > Unfortunately i have no chance to receive anything of ZEVS here in the > city :-( > > BTW maybe there is further information in the phase relations of the > dashes? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 12.05.2012 13:27, schrieb g3zjo: >> Oops the attach. was too big I think. >> >> Signals on 82Hz have been superb of late. See my Grabber >> http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm >> They have made an appearance almost 1 year to the day since the last. >> Is this due to propagation, or what? >> >> Last week there were extra transmission times, longer messages and a >> new (for me) frequency 83.2Hz is used, making 13 frequencies in total. >> >> I have used Henny's capture of a really long message, some of mine >> was obliterated by noise, to check the format and interpret the >> message, this is standard and does not use the new frequency. It is a >> big one compared with the 2011, 3 different tones repeated ones. >> >> The long message in the Capture :- S= Start, R= Repeat, E= End, for >> now I have called the new Frequency P= Page. >> >> S 10,12,6 R 10,12,6 E 10,9,6 R 10,9,6 E 9,4,3, R 9,4,3 E 5,12,6, R >> 5,12,6 E 3,12,5 R 3,12,5 E ----S 8,8,3 R 8,8,3 E >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > >