Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 69F54380000A5; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:09:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1STB87-0008Fh-4C for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 13:08:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1STB86-0008FY-Hx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 13:08:58 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1STB84-0003BJ-6g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 13:08:57 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q4CC8sXv030290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:08:54 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q4CC8s6E022235 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:08:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4FAE5294.40200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:07:48 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FAE4932.3070000@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAE4932.3070000@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie, Very good work, interesting!!! One day they will catch you and treat you as a spy. Then the members of this group have to put some money together to get you free again ;-) Looking forward to further results! :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: LF: 82Hz propagation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:291306976:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd4fae53126a90 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Eddie, Very good work, interesting!!! One day they will catch you and treat you as a spy. Then the members of this group have to put some money together to get you free again ;-) Looking forward to further results! :-) Unfortunately i have no chance to receive anything of ZEVS here in the city :-( BTW maybe there is further information in the phase relations of the dashes? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 12.05.2012 13:27, schrieb g3zjo: > Oops the attach. was too big I think. > > Signals on 82Hz have been superb of late. See my Grabber > http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm > They have made an appearance almost 1 year to the day since the last. > Is this due to propagation, or what? > > Last week there were extra transmission times, longer messages and a > new (for me) frequency 83.2Hz is used, making 13 frequencies in total. > > I have used Henny's capture of a really long message, some of mine was > obliterated by noise, to check the format and interpret the message, > this is standard and does not use the new frequency. It is a big one > compared with the 2011, 3 different tones repeated ones. > > The long message in the Capture :- S= Start, R= Repeat, E= End, for > now I have called the new Frequency P= Page. > > S 10,12,6 R 10,12,6 E 10,9,6 R 10,9,6 E 9,4,3, R 9,4,3 E 5,12,6, R > 5,12,6 E 3,12,5 R 3,12,5 E ----S 8,8,3 R 8,8,3 E > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO >