Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2793A3800008C; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:09:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SSREX-0001gA-P5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:08:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SSREX-0001g1-3q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:08:33 +0100 Received: from out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SSREV-0002HL-57 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:08:31 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnsDALSgq09Olntg/2dsb2JhbAANN7IVAQMBA4QvAQEBAQM4LyILCQ8JFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgVrDWOYYsNgwODJgSVfZMq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,564,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="527503358" Received: from host-78-150-123-96.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.123.96]) by out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 10 May 2012 12:08:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4FABA1AD.3070406@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:08:29 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FAAE5DB.2020309@talktalk.net> <4FAB9A48.2020606@dsl.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAB9A48.2020606@dsl.pipex.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Chris Ah you went and did it. I need not shake like a jelly. Yes, keeping up the food mentions, I have been crying in my soup since seeing the recent Grabs from you guys. the constant carrier allows time to get out the Brasso polish the display a bit and see the results, we are now back to last years performance levels. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.244 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: Re: LF: Zevs today Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:442184096:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41194faba1ea73b2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Chris Ah you went and did it. I need not shake like a jelly. Yes, keeping up the food mentions, I have been crying in my soup since seeing the recent Grabs from you guys. the constant carrier allows time to get out the Brasso polish the display a bit and see the results, we are now back to last years performance levels. Funny thing is, I see ZEVS 14, I don't see it on your grab, it is spot on frequency 83.4Hz and the same amplitude as the other Data its probably a long noise pulse sent to confuse me. 73 Eddie On 10/05/2012 11:36, Chris Dillon wrote: > Hi Eddie, Henny, Victor, VLF > > Zevs are positively chatty today - the longest message I've seen. Here > at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/20838053/zevs.jpg and also clear on Eddie's > grabber. > > 73 Chris G3WCD > > >