Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 83D6038000097; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:24:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SS8k4-0006q6-PF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 16:23:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SS8k4-0006px-Br for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 16:23:52 +0100 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SS8k2-0006il-FE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 16:23:51 +0100 X-Trace: 462091731/mk-outboundfilter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$PIPEX-ACCEPTED/pipex-temporary-group/79.75.96.160/None/c.r.dillon@dsl.pipex.com X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.75.96.160 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: c.r.dillon@dsl.pipex.com X-SMTP-AUTH: c.r.dillon%dsl.pipex.com X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAPiKqk9PS2Cg/2dsb2JhbAANN692hlcBAQEEOC8REQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQHEEYsMgmyDJgSbYI1I X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,558,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="462091731" X-IP-Direction: OUT Received: from 79-75-96-160.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([79.75.96.160]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 09 May 2012 16:23:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4FAA8C04.3020205@dsl.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 16:23:48 +0100 From: Chris Dillon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FAA795B.2020000@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAA795B.2020000@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Not everything seems to be getting through this afternoon - perhaps my attachments were too big. Here's what I sent earlier without the jpgs. Chris [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.74.114.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: LF: ZEVS Lives - reflector problems? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:398054688:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60574faa8c457812 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Not everything seems to be getting through this afternoon - perhaps my attachments were too big. Here's what I sent earlier without the jpgs. Chris ________________________________________ HI Eddie, Henny, VLF ZEVS has been very active lately - busier than I've ever seen it. I took a look at 82Hz on Sunday and there was a continuous carrier which has persisted until now. The carrier has been punctuated by several messages, some of them double sequences, and some spaced by only an hour or so seemingly at random times. Not at all like the old schedule. The carrier seems to have ended with today's message at 1300 which itself looks significantly longer than usual. But the rain has wiped out the rest of the signal for me too. Because i haven't looked for some time I don't know how long the carrier was on for before Sunday. Here's a couple of screen shots. 73 Chris G3WCD On 09/05/2012 15:04, g3zjo wrote: > LF > > A different time for ZEVS 13:00 UTC and a longer message format. A > nice signal, then it started to rain AGAIN. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO