Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B74C33800008B; Sat, 5 May 2012 06:48:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SQcWS-0004h1-Ts for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:47:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SQcWS-0004gs-AX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:47:32 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SQcWQ-0005L6-EV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:47:31 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q45AlTBs004995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 12:47:29 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q45AlTQI002793 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 12:47:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA50506.8020108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 12:46:30 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FA50263.60800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FA50263.60800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q45AlTBs004995 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: BTW Joe, i see good chances for you to leave a trace in YV now! There is a lot of QRN, anyway there is only water between the locations and the EU QRN at least is gone at 4 UTC or so. So you may have a few hours left... I just saw the sunrise in YV and a rapid decrease of QRN. All very interesting to have a grabber in SA now :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:449103232:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41164fa505881c9a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none BTW Joe, i see good chances for you to leave a trace in YV now! There is=20 a lot of QRN, anyway there is only water between the locations and the=20 EU QRN at least is gone at 4 UTC or so. So you may have a few hours left.= .. I just saw the sunrise in YV and a rapid decrease of QRN. All very=20 interesting to have a grabber in SA now :-) 73, Stefan Am 05.05.2012 12:35, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Hi Joe, LF, > > A late report from friday morning. I saw you with good strength=20 > between my transmissions. Even a QSO in QRSS-10 would have been no=20 > problem to that time. We should try soon again :-) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC