Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D7735380000A9; Wed, 2 May 2012 18:18:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SPhrz-000364-UL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 23:17:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SPhrz-00035v-CG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 23:17:59 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhrw-0005OY-50 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 23:17:58 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q42MHsu9009773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 00:17:54 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q42MHsVE004832 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 00:17:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA1B259.7080607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 00:16:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4FA11C9A.6020300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8CEF6C5E4F18849-17D0-1C8DA@webmail-m128.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <8CEF6C5E4F18849-17D0-1C8DA@webmail-m128.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, But just 10.9 uV/m ?? They must have quite a high Q on that antenna ;-) Maybe a lightning strike? Probably i'm thinking to analog... 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 027eb28428a0ed4e20e06b28d08cfc7b Subject: Re: LF: DCF39 OFF again Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010502080901050903060704" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:329707776:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60554fa1b2cb0e3c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010502080901050903060704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q42MHsu9009773 Hi Markus, But just 10.9 uV/m ?? They must have quite a high Q on that antenna ;-) Maybe a lightning strike? Probably i'm thinking to analog... 73, Stefan Am 02.05.2012 23:58, schrieb Markus Vester: > > They must have had some problems with the Burg transmitter running=20 > wild. Your screenshot shows a pair of unstable lines drifting down to=20 > 138.4 and 137.6 kHz. The very same lines appeared here, quite strong=20 > and noisy, with northerly colour: > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/dcf/test1205021000.jpg > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/dcf/test1205021015.jpg > Best 73, > Markus > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Mi, 2 Mai 2012 9:18 pm > Betreff: LF: DCF39 OFF again > > DCF39 was offline again this morning between 10 and 11 UTC. To the same > time HGA22 had much more traffic. > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DCFHGA.jpg > Maybe they plan to let HGA22 do the job of both? :-) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > --------------010502080901050903060704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q42MHsu9009773 Hi Markus,

But just 10.9 uV/m ?? They must have quite a high Q on that antenna ;-) Maybe a lightning strike? Probably i'm thinking to analog...

73, Stefan

Am 02.05.2012 23:58, schrieb Markus Vester:

They=C2=A0must have had some problems with the Burg transmitter running wild. Your screenshot shows=C2=A0a pair of unstable lines drifting down t= o 138.4 and 137.6 kHz. The very same lines appeared here, quite strong and noisy, with=C2=A0northerly colour:
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Best 73,
Markus=C2=A0=C2=A0

-= ----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heid= elberg.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 2 Mai 2012 9:18 pm
Betreff: LF: DCF39 OFF again

DCF39 was offline again this morning=
 between 10 and 11 UTC. To the same=20
time HGA22 had much more traffic.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DCFHGA.jpg
Maybe they plan to let HGA22 do the job of both? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------010502080901050903060704--