Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A42CA3817897F; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:54:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SPhUI-0002h9-LX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:53:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SPhUI-0002h0-9U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:53:30 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhUG-0005FE-GD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:53:29 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q42LrIK4003898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 23:53:18 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q42LrHnV004131 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 23:53:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA1AC95.6090209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 23:52:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <663CD88B-0F75-4AED-AD06-97DBA0BBB6D3@numeo.fr> In-Reply-To: <663CD88B-0F75-4AED-AD06-97DBA0BBB6D3@numeo.fr> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks John for the report. No problem about the S/N. 569 sounds good for me :-) The beacon was running for more than 50 hours without a interruption... 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC RST 549 to 569 on 137 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:363586400:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d4fa1ad1d49a4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks John for the report. No problem about the S/N. 569 sounds good for me :-) The beacon was running for more than 50 hours without a interruption... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 01.05.2012 11:48, schrieb John Rabson: > At 0946z. Sorry can't measure dB over noise (computer problem). > > F5VLF >