Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F05B83800009C; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:18:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SPguy-00024g-R5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:17:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SPguy-00024X-FM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:17:00 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPguw-00050r-68 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:16:59 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q42LGuLd027034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 23:16:56 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q42LGuK8003341 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 23:16:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA11C9A.6020300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:38:02 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: DCF39 was offline again this morning between 10 and 11 UTC. To the same time HGA22 had much more traffic. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DCFHGA.jpg Maybe they plan to let HGA22 do the job of both? :-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date X-Scan-Signature: 73624bb08a20c2e0895fd0d9fb8136a4 Subject: LF: DCF39 OFF again Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:343736704:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60574fa1a4934aa5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none DCF39 was offline again this morning between 10 and 11 UTC. To the same time HGA22 had much more traffic. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DCFHGA.jpg Maybe they plan to let HGA22 do the job of both? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC