Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B7C5D380021FD for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 15:02:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SPeAu-0000WZ-Nl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:21:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SPeAu-0000WQ-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:21:16 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPeAs-0004BJ-Ov for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 19:21:15 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApcBAGmxn09OlmIS/2dsb2JhbAANN4VpqRllhhEBAQEBAyNEERELBAEEDwkWCwICCQMCAQIBOgsTCAEBr06SYI1ggg2BGASOEZsY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,510,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="389574639" Received: from host-78-150-98-18.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.98.18]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 01 May 2012 10:52:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4F9FB278.8000504@talktalk.net> Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:52:56 +0100 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6AF9FA27D80A49C4BC95967CB103D19D@AGB> <4F9EDBDF.3030604@talktalk.net> <4CCEC10479A04AFF91E1823373CA6C00@AGB> In-Reply-To: <4CCEC10479A04AFF91E1823373CA6C00@AGB> X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Graham / second try This one wasn't returned as luncheon meat it didn't get there at all. Second decode was -44dB, about 10dB / Noise in 46mHz. Signal level varied and about 20% data lost in a block, XYL re arranged the configuration of the dining table antenna, they just don't understand! [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.2 TVD_SUBJ_ACC_NUM Subject has spammy looking monetary reference -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c9c533f07c530c146486ecf89a00ebb1 Subject: Re: LF: WANTED 8KHz OP4H OPERA =?UTF-8?B?VEVTVEVS4oCZUw==?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040406050802060500030208" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:463426912:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94fa184b62c8f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040406050802060500030208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Graham / second try This one wasn't returned as luncheon meat it didn't get there at all. Second decode was -44dB, about 10dB / Noise in 46mHz. Signal level varied and about 20% data lost in a block, XYL re arranged the configuration of the dining table antenna, they just don't understand! 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 30/04/2012 22:23, Graham wrote: > Tnx Ed, > Steady carrier, that should be one of the advantages of Op on 8Khz > , no real problems with sound card 's and frequency stability ! > Look's like you may have some signals from PA soon , not sure > what's happened to all the UK Tx stations , I know there was a > problem with having to inform the met-office .. > G.. > --------------040406050802060500030208 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Graham / second try

This one wasn't returned as luncheon meat it didn't get there at all.

Second decode was -44dB, about 10dB / Noise in 46mHz. Signal level varied and about 20% data lost in a block, XYL re arranged the configuration of the dining table antenna, they just don't understand!

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 30/04/2012 22:23, Graham wrote:
Tnx Ed,
 
Steady carrier, that should be  one of the  advantages of Op  on  8Khz , no  real  problems with  sound card 's  and  frequency  stability !
Look's  like  you  may have  some  signals  from PA soon , not  sure  what's happened  to  all the  UK  Tx  stations , I know  there was a  problem  with  having to  inform  the  met-office  ..
 
G..


--------------040406050802060500030208--