Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9ADF738000096; Thu, 24 May 2012 10:32:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SXZ4x-0004rT-Py for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:31:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SXZ4x-0004rK-EP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:31:51 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SXZ4v-0000mm-5A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:31:50 +0100 Received: from youry0mkaz8jaq ([95.150.182.90]) by mwinf5d21 with ME id DqXj1j00F1xRuJ703qXjRN; Thu, 24 May 2012 16:31:48 +0200 Message-ID: <013b01cd39b9$f2f61940$ae01a8c0@youry0mkaz8jaq> From: "Martin Evans" To: References: <929404BD8B3FA443A58163D1A9FC4FB711DC44@cygnus.czd.org.uk> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:31:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I moderate one Yahoo group, and am a member of at least another dozen, and fully agree with those proposing an LF Yahoo group, with all the facilities available. In ten years, there have been very very few problems, and those of a minor nature. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:412074496:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61894fbe46970aac X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I moderate one Yahoo group, and am a member of at least another dozen, and fully agree with those proposing an LF Yahoo group, with all the facilities available. In ten years, there have been very very few problems, and those of a minor nature. Let's go for it. Martin GW3UCJ.