Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A25FF38000087; Sat, 26 May 2012 15:31:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SYMgb-0000fk-7K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 20:30:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SYMga-0000fW-EA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 20:30:00 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SYMgP-000410-Dd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 20:29:59 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggOABAtwU9Ok8dl/2dsb2JhbABFiWWZIpByAQOBG4EIghIFAQEFCAEBAyUBFg0CLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAQklFAEEGgYMCggGEwoBAgIBAQEEh2cDDweteQOJWIsDGi8KhGwDiAyFLohsjmKCYIFf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,663,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="539309978" Received: from host-78-147-199-101.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.199.101]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 26 May 2012 20:29:42 +0100 Message-ID: <00eb01cd3b75$e51eb620$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> <4FBE6D2A.6000907@usa.net> <006b01cd39e2$0b66efe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <4FBFF28B.9080903@broadpark.no> <4FC123AE.2080303@broadpark.no> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 19:29:39 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I wonder if I am on the HIT list de G3KEV the Station for Information and Education ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steinar Aanesland" To: Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 6:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:488400480:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4084fc12f7d0889 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I wonder if I am on the HIT list de G3KEV the Station for Information and Education ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steinar Aanesland" To: Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 6:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE No big deal Chris. I have my own banning system. People with negative attitude are going straight to my spam folder on the mail server. They will never reach my PC ;) la5vna S Den 26.05.2012 15:39, skrev Chris: > This is EXACTLY why I say NO. > Chris, G4AYT. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steinar Aanesland" > > To: > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:58 PM > Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE > > > > hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;) > > LA5VNA S > > > Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul: >> >Do what you like but leave me OUT >> >G3KEV >> >> I vote for yahoo.) >> >> 73 >> Clemens >> DL4RAJ >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: mal hamilton >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE >> A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have > an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED. >> No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly > democratic. >> What next ??????????? >> I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and > experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not > hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by > others !! >> Do what you like but leave me OUT >> G3KEV >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Alberto di Bene >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead >> .....PLEASE >> On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote: >>> Why not go for it and start it yourself. >>> We know some will not move so it will be an additional > facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f >>> frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no > childish sulking. >> Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning > that each request for membership should be >> accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining > why that membership is requested. >> Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to > accept it or not. I suppose the same is done >> presently with the Majordomo mailer. >> >> And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a > point... then the moderator can accept the individual, >> but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every > message from him must be examined by the moderator(s) >> before being published. The moderation status can be removed > after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy, >> showing that he is not a troll or spammer. >> >> I use this method on my soft_radio Yahoo group >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/ >> with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had > just a couple of cases where a spam message >> got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group. >> >> 73 Alberto I2PHD >> >> E-Mail ist virenfrei. >> Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de >> Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum: > 24.05.2012 >> > > > > >