Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 696C338000305; Sat, 26 May 2012 10:11:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SYHhb-0004Kz-74 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 15:10:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SYHha-0004Kq-QY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 15:10:42 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SYHhZ-0002Qq-63 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 15:10:41 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsMAPXjwE9cF/sf/2dsb2JhbAA7CollqhMBA4EbgQiCEgUBAQQBCAEBAyUBIwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHdQm4A4sDEDkKgVaDFgONOpdOgmA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,661,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="373238362" Received: from host-92-23-251-31.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.251.31]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 26 May 2012 15:10:38 +0100 Message-ID: <005f01cd3b49$52f016d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FC0DF9A.8050000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 14:10:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Around EU the CW mode is more appropriate and QRSS reserved for DX for those unable to make it on CW. G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 1:50 PM Subject: LF: LF acty [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: LF: Re: LF acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:508001024:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d94fc0e49c70bc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Around EU the CW mode is more appropriate and QRSS reserved for DX for those unable to make it on CW. G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 1:50 PM Subject: LF: LF acty > LF, > > Wow, i can see DG3MDE, G3XDV and it seems there is a new Italian LF > station on the band, right on 137.7 in DFCW-3 or so. I still didn't > identify the call but to my surprise this is an active and exciting LF > afternoon! > > A year back i was worried about a "dead" band during the summer period > but now i know there can be quite good conds arround the groundwave > distance in the afternoon, even better than in winther, as long as there > is no local QRN! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >