Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4923B380000F5; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:36:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SNQiq-0004Np-Hk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:35:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SNQiq-0004Ng-4y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:35:08 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNQin-0008Hv-RP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:35:07 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.82]) by mwinf5d49 with ME id 2fb11j00C1mFXqS03fb1o2; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:35:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:35:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120426-0, 26/04/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mauro did ask ' the better digital mode ' as "reverse beacon" and listed 3 modes. I think this relates to internet linked s/n reporting systems , as wspr / lentus / Opera and other's that have web linking and not simple recognition ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:467451520:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60194f996b783b93 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Mauro did ask ' the better digital mode ' as "reverse beacon" and listed 3 modes. I think this relates to internet linked s/n reporting systems , as wspr / lentus / Opera and other's that have web linking and not simple recognition ? Now if some one can slow a CW skimmer down slightly , there is a opportunity to read qrss as a reverse CW beacon mode and report s/n via the web ! G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "IK1WVQ Mauro" Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:27 AM To: Subject: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band > Hi, > > what is the better digital mode for starting listening 137 KHz band as > "reverse beacon" (no TX)?? > ("better" = greater number of active stations in Europe) > > WSPR ?? LENTUS ?? OPERA ?? > > what frequency is utilized for those modes ??? > > thanks in advance to all .. > > 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ > > P.S.: my RX station is : PA0RDT 8 meters over the roof, RACALL 1792 .. not > great station at all .. > in QRSS mode the only station what I can receive is the "broadcast (HI!)" > beacon of Stefan DK7FC .. NO OTHER ... > >