Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0DBF43800009B; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SNStA-0004vr-Ay for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:53:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SNSt9-0004vi-U0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:53:55 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNSt8-0000IM-C1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:53:54 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.82]) by mwinf5d47 with ME id 2hto1j0091mFXqS03hto1B; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:53:53 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:53:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120426-0, 26/04/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Can anyone advise on the planning relevance / requirements to these questions , with regards to Ae pole at the bottom of the garden 1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground? 2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base? 3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment resulted in the erection of an entirely new mast, [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 7f2e5481aa97b3cbff3d653a1b2ddfbd Subject: LF: UK Ae mast planning info Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D6_01CD23DD.E89E85A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1464f998c026212 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D6_01CD23DD.E89E85A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can anyone advise on the planning relevance / requirements to these = questions , with regards to Ae pole at the bottom of the garden 1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground? 2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base? 3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment resulted = in the erection of an entirely new mast, what is the relevance of the base being concreted into the ground = ? I assume the question of detaching the pole from the base is one = of permanent or temporary structure ? replacing like with like would not be classed as a new mast ? Tnx -G ------=_NextPart_000_01D6_01CD23DD.E89E85A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Can anyone  advise on the  planning  relevance  = /=20 requirements to  these  questions  , with  regards = to =20 Ae pole  at the  bottom of the  garden
 
1. Is = the secure=20 base moveable or is it concreted into the ground?
2. Can = the mast be=20 readily removed from the secure base?
3. If = the mast is a=20 permanent structure, has the refurbishment resulted in the erection of = an=20 entirely new mast,
 
what  is the  relevance  of the  base  = being=20 concreted into the  ground ?
 
I assume the  question  of  detaching  = the  pole=20 from the  base  is  one  of  permanent  or = temporary  structure ?
 
replacing  like with  like  would  not  be = classed=20 as  a  new mast ?
 
Tnx -G
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_01D6_01CD23DD.E89E85A0--