Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 990193800F2B9; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:11:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SJQ9Z-0004Fc-D0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:10:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SJQ9Y-0004FT-TD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:10:08 +0100 Received: from mail-vb0-f43.google.com ([209.85.212.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SJQ9X-000662-0H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:10:07 +0100 Received: by vbbfq11 with SMTP id fq11so6989275vbb.16 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:10:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=6e7bquj6xC8TD+0WhAjELg/OjEBjZDnHd7FPxlhc7RU=; b=SA2/hX9w04FX9Rh3nDPrrcL5uHrgJVogcBZjw2ZKLkGGnjFNpogGlsqWNVoyEBPqlF 8Wso6tCNEHsLxF/kdcWaxyIL91zFlpCAyDIq4JW0f7ICJGfKu7gJJ6sIk3fEfQGsyH5N dCAcWRwet+3th5A/El/s0DbB4olV8PrFFEu9Cjgqstcod8Mhx43EA3cCNe3bhxM1oUA5 cXGlS+T/2Zxe+WL/oS4pKdo8lLsl5S+yRjBD6SniIlXw3waiIBG73+PNvl4Sh+YBoDmJ I7ZPfkEh8W2ZDhT45uZTijDNw0CFs7JjmFI8/CPssyuKHUFsjCU6araXFDACrANPSGf+ lZHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.72.169 with SMTP id e9mr3469007vdv.21.1334499004829; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.228.135 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:10:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [132.185.240.120] In-Reply-To: <20120415130746.69p0wok6oocw000w@webmail.senselan.ch> References: <20120415104118.xw4cii7ibk00ow0o@webmail.senselan.ch> <1SJM8m-1vd6B80@fwd18.t-online.de> <20120415130746.69p0wok6oocw000w@webmail.senselan.ch> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: From: DAVE PICK To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXUY4lVbKUcOUNAm3GNvwKdE5Bf6M+l0OJbIznc/YA+euRY2f+v5LwleuJluLVf32KkWoE X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: According to all the information on the Marconi historical sites it would have been 600m. The installation on the Titanic could use LW (600m) or SW (300m) bands but was set to 600m when it went down. http://marconigraph.com/titanic/wireless/mgy_wireless.html [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: Re: LF: Titanic Frequency Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071d0a222d18f04bdb84353 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:442878656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m223.2 ; domain : No domain found DKIM : none x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad34f8ad7125343 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --20cf3071d0a222d18f04bdb84353 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 According to all the information on the Marconi historical sites it would have been 600m. The installation on the Titanic could use LW (600m) or SW (300m) bands but was set to 600m when it went down. http://marconigraph.com/titanic/wireless/mgy_wireless.html Dave G3YXM --20cf3071d0a222d18f04bdb84353 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
According to all the information on the Marconi historical sites it wo= uld have been 600m.
The installation on the Titanic could use LW (600m) or SW (300m) bands= but was set to 600m when it went down.
=A0
Dave G3YXM

--20cf3071d0a222d18f04bdb84353--