Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A948B38000097; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SNO8k-0003Ft-P8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:49:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SNO8k-0003Fk-1j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:49:42 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNO8h-0007bC-PF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:49:40 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.82]) by mwinf5d15 with ME id 2cpY1j00E1mFXqS03cpZ5D; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <201204261210.q3QCApb8010726@vivaldi47.register.it> In-Reply-To: <201204261210.q3QCApb8010726@vivaldi47.register.it> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:49:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120426-0, 26/04/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Just one or two thing's to check The S/N readings produced by Opera are referenced to the SIM - PATH software , so s/n levels shown are calibrated to a different standard The original system was calibrated to be similar to fldigi / wspr , but after a series of tests by members of the yahoo digital group, Jose , felt these levels where not realistic and re calibrated , giving a lesser reading. Im not sure as what Patrick has referenced his modes to, but if lentus system is similar to jt65 etc , then you will need to add a conversion factor. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 17343f7e400f1005b5081acbd4115359 Subject: Re: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:473645440:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4f9944a6006f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Just one or two thing's to check The S/N readings produced by Opera are referenced to the SIM - PATH software , so s/n levels shown are calibrated to a different standard The original system was calibrated to be similar to fldigi / wspr , but after a series of tests by members of the yahoo digital group, Jose , felt these levels where not realistic and re calibrated , giving a lesser reading. Im not sure as what Patrick has referenced his modes to, but if lentus system is similar to jt65 etc , then you will need to add a conversion factor. As a yard stick , OP2 @ -26dB S/N is similar to WSPR, Also note the Op s/n levels are all indicated as Average , over the time line , so if you only decode 50% of the transmission (sufficient for decode) then the s/n level will show as -3dB compared to 100% decode The Opera system has also a QSO mode using the same coding system, but is set to 120 second TX period for 15 characters and operates round the -20 dB s/n level Set Op to 500 Khz for access to the qso mode if wanting to try, but you do need -20 dB s/n for decode, ROS-MF7&2 mode is available ,multi tone, 99Hz b/w at 2 baud , this operates at the same S/N of WSPR , but needs AUDIO/SDR Tx facility. however it is a live rtty mode with no 'time frame' or 'time locking' MF-7 is 6 / 7 dB less, but has a chr rate similar to psk31.... 73 -G.. >>>The OP system is still under development , so if users have any >>>requirements etc , pls write in<<< -------------------------------------------------- From: "DP engineering" Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:10 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band > Hi Mauro, > At the present, I think Opera is the most widely used. > WSPR reaches -27db, not enough for covering long distances on LF. So, it's > rarely used. > Opera and lentus perform better: > Lentus reaches -34db for 5 minutes trasmission, Opera8 and Opera32 (8/32 > minutes trasmission) reach -32db and -38db respectively. > In my opinion, technically speaking, Lentus is the best (it is also very > good for making QSO). Lentus requires a very good syncronization among > station. In addition, if you use a SDR, you may have some problems due to > the latency of the SDR. > Instead, Opera is very simple and very close to the "regular" QRSS. > > So, my conclusions are: > > For medium distance beacons : Opera8 or Lentus > Foe long distance beacons : Opera32 > For QSO : Lentus > > best 73's' > I5ZPO Gino (operated by IW5BHY Andrea) > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: ik1wvq@stmb.it >>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>Data: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:27:27 +0200 >>Subject: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band > >>Hi, >> >>what is the better digital mode for starting listening 137 KHz >>band as "reverse beacon" (no TX)?? >>("better" = greater number of active stations in Europe) >> >>WSPR ?? LENTUS ?? OPERA ?? >> >>what frequency is utilized for those modes ??? >> >>thanks in advance to all .. >> >>73 de Mauro IK1WVQ >> >>P.S.: my RX station is : PA0RDT 8 meters over the roof, RACALL 1792 >>.. not great station at all .. >>in QRSS mode the only station what I can receive is the "broadcast >>(HI!)" beacon of Stefan DK7FC .. NO OTHER ... >> >> >> >> > >