Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0495C380000B5; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:45:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SNUcE-0005Ni-VA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:44:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SNUcE-0005NZ-G3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:44:34 +0100 Received: from filter02.i-online.fr ([195.200.78.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNUcC-0000Ye-Mq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:44:33 +0100 Received: from smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com ([195.200.78.13]) by filter02.i-online.fr (IceWarp 10.2.2) with ESMTP (SSL) id KXS53926 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:44:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 10643 invoked by uid 507); 26 Apr 2012 21:44:23 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (john.rabson@numeo.fr@217.67.155.178) by smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2012 21:44:23 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: John Rabson X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:44:29 +0200 Message-Id: References: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Graham, Can the RSGB help? Do they have a guidance booklet or something? John F5VLF [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: UK Ae mast planning info Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B829F59C-0993-41A3-926C-EA05D50CED34" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:458798336:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60554f99a5d20969 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror --Apple-Mail=_B829F59C-0993-41A3-926C-EA05D50CED34 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Graham, Can the RSGB help? Do they have a guidance booklet or something? John F5VLF On 26 Apr 2012, at 19:53CEST, Graham wrote: > Can anyone advise on the planning relevance / requirements to = these questions , with regards to Ae pole at the bottom of the = garden > =20 > 1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground? > 2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base? > 3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment = resulted in the erection of an entirely new mast, > =20 > what is the relevance of the base being concreted into the = ground ? > =20 > I assume the question of detaching the pole from the base is = one of permanent or temporary structure ? > =20 > replacing like with like would not be classed as a new mast ? > =20 > Tnx -G > =20 > =20 --Apple-Mail=_B829F59C-0993-41A3-926C-EA05D50CED34 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Graham,

Can the RSGB help? Do they have a guidance booklet or something?

John F5VLF

On 26 Apr 2012, at 19:53CEST, Graham wrote:

Can anyone  advise on the  planning  relevance  / requirements to  these  questions  , with  regards to  Ae pole  at the  bottom of the  garden
 
1. Is the secure base moveable or is it concreted into the ground?
2. Can the mast be readily removed from the secure base?
3. If the mast is a permanent structure, has the refurbishment resulted in the erection of an entirely new mast,
 
what  is the  relevance  of the  base  being concreted into the  ground ?
 
I assume the  question  of  detaching  the  pole from the  base  is  one  of  permanent  or temporary  structure ?
 
replacing  like with  like  would  not  be classed as  a  new mast ?
 
Tnx -G
 
 

--Apple-Mail=_B829F59C-0993-41A3-926C-EA05D50CED34--