Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 03847380000DD; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:02:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SOuuh-0003vo-SO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:01:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SOuuh-0003vf-GQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:01:31 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SOuuf-0005WG-FH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:01:30 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3UI1SvP007809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:01:28 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q3UI1R5E017486 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:01:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4F9ED341.6030006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:00:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005701cd26eb$b5c94910$0200a8c0@boxa> In-Reply-To: <005701cd26eb$b5c94910$0200a8c0@boxa> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Mike, Am 30.04.2012 18:10, schrieb Mike: > My set up at present is experimental and have even today, > with > the aid of your signal made several dB improvement. > Glad to hear that! Thanks. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: Re: LF: 137 kHz Audible IO90MS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:368065728:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb4f9ed3ba1e6e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Mike, Am 30.04.2012 18:10, schrieb Mike: > My set up at present is experimental and have even today, > with > the aid of your signal made several dB improvement. > Glad to hear that! Thanks. 73, Stefan