Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 29B7B3800009A; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:45:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SNN7V-0002np-1q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:44:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SNN7U-0002ng-LT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:44:20 +0100 Received: from out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNN7S-0007IS-Ne for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:44:19 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAJo0mU9Olm8i/2dsb2JhbAANN7RbAQEBAQM4Mw0NBAsJCAQBAQEJFg8JAwIBAgE9CBMGAgEBh3sDFrElGolGjUCDJQSOEIh+ii+HaQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,486,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="525947135" Received: from host-78-150-111-34.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.7]) ([78.150.111.34]) by out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2012 12:44:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4F993510.2090500@talktalk.net> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:44:16 +0100 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F99285B.9010306@talktalk.net> <9A25BE5BE02B4CC09F1953F529FC57D8@Extensa> In-Reply-To: <9A25BE5BE02B4CC09F1953F529FC57D8@Extensa> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: GM Peter I was awaiting an expert again:-) we become an expert when we have done something for a long time and the answers come easy to us. It looks like the Alpha's have started on 4 new frequencies, probably old ones re instated. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.244 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Alpha's Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:500085600:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60194f9935640805 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none GM Peter I was awaiting an expert again:-) we become an expert when we have done something for a long time and the answers come easy to us. It looks like the Alpha's have started on 4 new frequencies, probably old ones re instated. A nice quiet night on VLF here, again experts, are the horizontal curtains Aurora? 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 26/04/2012 12:00, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: > Eddie, all. > > Looks like they have trouble with phase glitches like I have here with > that 8970.1 Hz generator :-) > http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ > > Peter - PA1SDB > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:50 AM > Subject: LF: Alpha's > > >> Hi LF >> >> What are the Alphas doing? >> >> Eddie G3ZJO >> >> http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm >> > >