Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 627DC380000B4; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:53:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SLIwy-0001Xi-7A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:52:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SLIwx-0001XZ-NI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:52:55 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SLIwv-0003Id-Ag for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:52:54 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3KIqpVN005431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:52:51 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q3KIqpHH018658 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:52:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4F91B055.8060701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:52:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <747B7F1ACC2344CA812AF33D422316C0@AGB> <002d01cd1f1a$5abe8ae0$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <002d01cd1f1a$5abe8ae0$4001a8c0@lark> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Alan, What do you estimate, what is the average global background noise level increase in dB due to the rising QRM generators (SMPS, plasma TV, energy saving lamps.....) since these early days? 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ead411ce91f9601ce3974c7575797436 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136 propagation a QRO secret ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:440227136:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60894f91b0bc71db X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Alan, What do you estimate, what is the average global background noise level increase in dB due to the rising QRM generators (SMPS, plasma TV, energy saving lamps.....) since these early days? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 20.04.2012 19:20, schrieb Alan Melia: > Hi Graham you may not be aware that the only modes that were available in > the early days when the 1st TAs were achieved was QRSS3. Robert Horne, > author of Spectrogram saw now use or reason for a slower > waterfall.....remember he is a biologist and this suite was written for > recording and analysing animal and marine mammal sounds. The results were > obtained in a period or high geomagnetic activity just after the peak of the > last Solar max (Geomag activity trails sun-spots by about a year) We have > just had the quietest minimum for years and the level of activity is > relative to the last max still quite low. > > The modern digital modes are around 20dB more sensitive than QRSS3 this > accounts for the difference between 100s watts and less that 10 watts, even > allowing for quieter conditions. I think this is what you usually call > "progress" :-)) > > Alan > G3NYK > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Graham" > To: > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:32 AM > Subject: LF: 136 propagation a QRO secret ? > > > Have the high power operators on 136 been keeping the real potential > of 136 propagation a secret ? writing you name in neon light is one > thing , but behind the glow of the sign , previously un seen, the data > recording Op beacon system is starting to reveal some interesting > features of this band. > > Results from the first 'plug and play' 'peoples' beacon, seem to > show , DX operation on 136 is not quite as difficult as was perhaps > made out , from the first TA decode of OP8 , using a > Parasol-on-a-Stick , with a few hundred watts , to RA3AGC long wire to > the trees , with similar power and PA0A 'small array' .. 2000 Kmtr + > decodes are showing up on a quite regular basis , may be more than that > offered by 500 KHz ? > > VK 136 operators have expressed interest in setting up sked's to > make, what could be the first full call sign decode , to down under, > but to date, it seems there are no transmit takers this side , > > Technically, the processing gain of OP32 , is very close to the > estimated -40 dB path loss , EU-VK and should require 16 mins of > carrier above the s/n threshold in 32 mins to decode ... > > Anyone tempted to make a sked ? > > G,, > > 24 hour usage from http://pskreporter.info/pskmapn.html > > Txmtr Rcvr Band Mode Distance Time (UTC) > 7L1RLL 7L1RLL 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:54:58 > PA3BHT PA3BHT 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:53:41 > PA0WMR PA0WMR 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:45:35 > JH1ARY JH1ARY 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:43:42 > UA0SNV-1 UA0SNV-1 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:36:19 > JP1ODJ JP1ODJ 2200m OPERA 0 kms 09:34:55 > JF1PSS JF1PSS 2200m OPERA 0 kms 07:38:29 > UA0SNV UA0SNV 2200m OPERA 0 kms 07:33:19 > JH1INM JH1INM 2200m OPERA 0 kms 06:39:52 > JA8SCD JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 0 kms 06:29:50 > 7L1RLL JH1INM 2200m OPERA 76 kms 03:34:10 > 7L1RLL JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 26 kms 03:34:10 > 7L1RLL JP1ODJ 2200m OPERA 50 kms 03:34:09 > JH1GVY JH1GVY 2200m OPERA 0 kms 03:03:32 > JH1GVY JH1INM 2200m OPERA 99 kms 02:53:27 > JH1GVY JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 18 kms 02:53:27 > JH1GVY JP1ODJ 2200m OPERA 29 kms 02:53:26 > JH1GVY JH1ARY 2200m OPERA 8 kms 02:53:26 > JH1GVY 7L1RLL/1 2200m OPERA 35 kms 02:53:25 > JF1PSS JF1PSS 2200m OPERA 0 kms 00:05:54 > JH1GVV JH1GVV 2200m OPERA 0 kms 23:52:38 > RN3AGC RN3AGC 2200m OPERA 0 kms 22:14:04 > PA0A PA0A 2200m OPERA 0 kms 21:41:06 > PA0A RW3ADB 2200m OPERA 2017 kms 21:39:21 > PA0A RN3AGC 2200m OPERA 2020 kms 21:39:04 > RW3ADB RW3ADB 2200m OPERA 0 kms 21:29:27 > G0KYE G0KYE 2200m OPERA 0 kms 21:24:03 > PA3ABK PA3ABK 2200m OPERA 0 kms 20:36:47 > PA0OCD PA0OCD 2200m OPERA 0 kms 19:45:48 > G8HUH G8HUH 2200m OPERA 0 kms 19:01:25 > PA0OCD PA0A 2200m OPERA 128 kms 18:50:46 > G4MDH G4MDH 2200m OPERA 0 kms 18:32:30 > YO2LDK YO2LDK 2200m OPERA 0 kms 18:31:21 > PA0OCD PA3ABK 2200m OPERA 62 kms 17:44:05 > LZ1LZ LZ1LZ 2200m OPERA 0 kms 15:12:01 > >